Cited by 49Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesFace Recognition and PerceptionEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Effects of Male Anxiety Chemosignals on the Evaluation of Happy Facial Expressions

Zernecke, Rebekka, Haegler, Katrin, Kleemann, Anna Maria, Albrecht, Jessica, Frank, Tilman, Linn, Jennifer, Brückmann, Hartmut, Wiesmann, Martin·2011·Journal of Psychophysiology

Abstract

The communication of chemosensory alarm signals is well explored in mammals. In humans the effects of anxiety substances might seem to be less important due to their high-developed visual system, and their sophisticated ability to communicate via speech and body language. Nevertheless, an increasing number of studies suggest an effect of chemosignals of anxiety on human physiology and behavior. In the present study two kinds of human sweat were collected from 21 males during a bicycle workout and a visit of a high rope course, and were then applied to 15 different healthy male participants during an emotion evaluation task. Participants were instructed to rate emotional male faces of different morphing levels (neutral-happy) by using a visual analog scale under exposure of three different samples (exercise sweat, anxiety sweat, and control material). Our study revealed that men rated happy faces as less happy under the influence of anxiety sweat compared to the exercise and the control conditions; significant differences were demonstrated only for ambiguous emotional faces. In conclusion, chemosignals of anxiety comprised in human sweat are communicated between males; they diminish the evaluation of ambiguous happy male facial expressions in men and thereby influence the perception of emotional faces.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/0269-8803/a000047

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zernecke, R., Haegler, K., Kleemann, A. M., Albrecht, J., Frank, T., Linn, J., Brückmann, H., & Wiesmann, M.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Monell Chemical Senses Center (US)
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Venue
Journal of Psychophysiology
Published
2011-01
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
116-123
ISSN
  • 0269-8803 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-2124
OpenAlex
W2129906670
Cited by
49
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
chemosignals, anxiety, sweat, facial expression perception, happy facial expressions, ambiguous emotions, affective evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review