Cited by 9Stress Responses and CortisolStudent Stress and CopingStress and Burnout Research

Under Which Circumstances Does Academic Workload Lead to Stress?: Explaining Intraindividual Differences by Using the Cortisol-Awakening Response as a Moderator

Koudela-Hamila, Susanne, Santangelo, Philip S., Ebner-Priemer, Ulrich W., Schlotz, Wolff·2022·Journal of Psychophysiology

Abstract

Abstract. Academic stress is associated with a wide range of adverse outcomes, including detrimental effects on mental health, achievement, and well-being. Numerous studies have shown an association between the cortisol awakening response (CAR) and various health and risk factors. Some studies revealed a protective function of the CAR as a stress buffer preventing the stress system from overshooting. We investigated the moderating effect of the CAR on the within-subject association between academic workload and academic stress in participants’ daily lives using ambulatory assessment. We assessed 77 undergraduate university participants for 2 days at the beginning of the semester and approximately 3 months later, individually starting one week before an exam. Participants provided academic stress and academic workload ratings hourly during their waking time using smartphone-based e-diaries and salivary cortisol samples at awakening as well as 30, 45, and 60 min later on two consecutive days during each of the assessment waves. Average within-subject associations between academic workload and academic stress were analyzed using multilevel models. Interactions with indicators of the cortisol awakening response (CAR) were included to test moderating effects of the CAR on the workload-stress associations. There was a significant positive within-subject association between academic workload and academic stress. Significant cross-level interactions showed a moderating effect of the CAR on this association. The results point out the importance of the CAR in the regulation of the workload-stress associations in academic life and underscore the relevance of investigating the influence of specific stressor-dependent reciprocal effects of the CAR on learning and experienced stress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/0269-8803/a000293

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 52 · Cited by 9

Authors
Koudela-Hamila, S., Santangelo, P. S., Ebner-Priemer, U. W., & Schlotz, W.
Affiliations
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
  • Department of Applied Psychology, Karlsruher Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
  • Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics (DE)
Venue
Journal of Psychophysiology
Published
2022-07-01
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
188-197
ISSN
  • 0269-8803 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-2124
OpenAlex
W4210347718
Cited by
9
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
academic workload, academic stress, cortisol awakening response, stress buffering, salivary cortisol, ambulatory assessment, moderating effect, university students, stress regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review