Under Which Circumstances Does Academic Workload Lead to Stress?: Explaining Intraindividual Differences by Using the Cortisol-Awakening Response as a Moderator
Abstract
Abstract. Academic stress is associated with a wide range of adverse outcomes, including detrimental effects on mental health, achievement, and well-being. Numerous studies have shown an association between the cortisol awakening response (CAR) and various health and risk factors. Some studies revealed a protective function of the CAR as a stress buffer preventing the stress system from overshooting. We investigated the moderating effect of the CAR on the within-subject association between academic workload and academic stress in participants’ daily lives using ambulatory assessment. We assessed 77 undergraduate university participants for 2 days at the beginning of the semester and approximately 3 months later, individually starting one week before an exam. Participants provided academic stress and academic workload ratings hourly during their waking time using smartphone-based e-diaries and salivary cortisol samples at awakening as well as 30, 45, and 60 min later on two consecutive days during each of the assessment waves. Average within-subject associations between academic workload and academic stress were analyzed using multilevel models. Interactions with indicators of the cortisol awakening response (CAR) were included to test moderating effects of the CAR on the workload-stress associations. There was a significant positive within-subject association between academic workload and academic stress. Significant cross-level interactions showed a moderating effect of the CAR on this association. The results point out the importance of the CAR in the regulation of the workload-stress associations in academic life and underscore the relevance of investigating the influence of specific stressor-dependent reciprocal effects of the CAR on learning and experienced stress.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Academic workload has a significantly positive relationship with academic stress among university students.
“Koudela-Hamila et al. (2022) found a significantly positive relationship between academic workload and academic stress among university students.”
From Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students (2024) · cites this paper as Koudela-Hamila et al. (2022)
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 52 · Cited by 9
- Authors
- Koudela-Hamila, S., Santangelo, P. S., Ebner-Priemer, U. W., & Schlotz, W.
- Affiliations
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
- Department of Applied Psychology, Karlsruher Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
- Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics (DE)
- Venue
- Journal of Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Hogrefe Publishing Group
- Published
- 2022-07-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 188-197
- ISSN
- 0269-8803 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-2124
- OpenAlex
- W4210347718
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Keywords
- academic workload, academic stress, cortisol awakening response, stress buffering, salivary cortisol, ambulatory assessment, moderating effect, university students, stress regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review