The Assessment of Psychological Strain in Work Contexts
Abstract
Irritation as defined in this paper is the subjectively perceived emotional and cognitive strain in occupational contexts. The structural equivalence of the Arabic, Dutch, English, French, Italian, Russian, Spanish, Turkish, and Polish adaptations of the German Irritation Scale is examined. The Irritation Scale is recommended for application particularly in occupational contexts. In this field it can be used for evaluating interventions, for research on stress at work, and for individual counseling. Exploratory factor analyses, as well as single group and different multiple-group confirmatory factor analyses, were performed. Structural equivalency in terms of equal factor loadings as well as equal factor covariances across all adaptations can be claimed. However, the single group analyses suggest that the hypothesized factor model should be rejected in the English, Russian, Spanish, and Turkish versions, mainly because of borderline values in the RMSEA index.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Work strain is manifested during leisure time in form of ruminative efforts concerning goal-achievement that can hinder psychological regeneration and be a risk factor for depression.
“Hereby work strain is manifested during leisure time in form of ruminative efforts concerning goal-achievement that can hinder psychological regeneration and be a risk factor for depression [69].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 236
- Authors
- Mohr, G., Müller, A., Rigotti, T., Aycan, Z., & Tschan, F.
- Affiliations
- Leipzig University (DE)
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Koç University (TR)
- University of Neuchâtel (CH)
- Venue
- European Journal of Psychological Assessment
- Publisher
- Hogrefe Publishing Group
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 198-206
- ISSN
- 1015-5759 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-2426
- OpenAlex
- W1974010424
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 5.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
- Keywords
- psychological strain, occupational stress, cross-cultural adaptation, structural equivalence, measurement invariance, factor models, work context
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review