CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 318Mental Health Research TopicsContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ambulatory Assessment - Monitoring Behavior in Daily Life Settings

Fahrenberg, Jochen, Myrtek, Michael, Pawlik, Kurt, Perrez, Meinrad·2007·European Journal of Psychological Assessment
DOI 10.1027/1015-5759.23.4.206
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract. Ambulatory assessment refers to the use of computer-assisted methodology for self-reports, behavior records, or physiological measurements, while the participant undergoes normal daily activities. Since the 1980s, portable microcomputer systems and physiological recorders/analyzers have been developed for this purpose. In contrast to their use in medicine, these new methods have hardly entered the domain of psychology. Questionnaire methods are still preferred, in spite of the known deficiencies of retrospective self-reports. Assessment strategies include: continuous monitoring, monitoring with time- and event-sampling methods, in-field psychological testing, field experimentation, interactive assessment, symptom monitoring, and self-management. These approaches are innovative and address ecological validity, context specificity, and are suitable for practical applications. The advantages of this methodology, as well as issues of acceptance, compliance, and reactivity are discussed. Many technical developments and research contributions have come from the German-speaking countries and the Netherlands. Nonetheless, the current Decade of Behavior (APA) calls for a more widespread use of such techniques and developments in assessment. This position paper seeks to make the case for this approach by demonstrating the advantages - and in some domains - necessities of ambulatory monitoring methodology for a behavioral science orientation in psychology.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/1015-5759.23.4.206

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. American Psychological Association, 1999, APA MONITOR Online, 30
  2. Buse L., 1984, Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 15, 44
  3. Magnusson D., 1980, Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 1, 17
  4. Pawlik K., 1988, Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 9, 169
  5. Pawlik K., 1982, Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 3, 101
  6. Pawlik, K. Buse, L. (1996). Verhaltensbeobachtung in Labor und Feld. [Behavior observation in the laboratory and in the field]. In K. Pawlik (Eds.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie. Differentielle Psychologie und Persönlichkeitsforschung. Band 1. Grundlagen und Methoden der Differentiellen Psychologie [Encyclopedia of psychology: Differential psychology and personality research. Vol. 1: Foundations and methods of differential psychology] (pp. 359-394). Göttingen: Hogrefe
  7. Perrez M., 2006, Verhaltenstherapie & Psychosoziale Praxis, 38, 319
  8. Perrez M., 1989, Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 10, 129

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–318 of 318

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Fahrenberg, J., Myrtek, M., Pawlik, K., & Perrez, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • University of Fribourg (CH)
ORCID
Perrez, Meinrad
Venue
European Journal of Psychological Assessment
Publisher
Hogrefe Publishing Group
Published
2007-01
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
206-213
ISSN
  • 1015-5759 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-2426
DOI
10.1027/1015-5759.23.4.206
OpenAlex
W1946903833
Cited by
317
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 21
FWCI
13.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
ambulatory assessment, ecological validity, physiological measures, self-report, temporal sampling, event sampling, field experiments, interactive assessment, symptom monitoring, self-management, reactivity, participant compliance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review