The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tucker's Congruence Coefficient as a Meaningful Index of Factor Similarity
Abstract
When Tucker's congruence coefficient is used to assess the similarity of factor interpretations, it is desirable to have a critical congruence level less than unity that can be regarded as indicative of identity of the factors. The literature only reports rules of thumb. The present article repeats and broadens the approach used in the study by Haven and ten Berge ( 1977 ). It aims to find a critical congruence level on the basis of judgments of factor similarity by practitioners of factor analysis. Our results suggest that a value in the range .85-.94 corresponds to a fair similarity, while a value higher than .95 implies that the two factors or components compared can be considered equal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 19,023
Sample size in factor analysis.
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.4.1.84 · Cited by 5,497
Cited by
How Should the Internal Structure of Personality Inventories Be Evaluated?
Hopwood, C. J., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868310361240 · Cited by 659
Jennings, P. A., Brown, J. L., Frank, J. L., Doyle, S., Oh, Y., Davis, R., Rasheed, D., DeWeese, A., DeMauro, A. A., Cham, H., et al. (2017) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000187 · Cited by 645
Swami, V., & Barron, D. (2019) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.08.014 · Cited by 454
Shutova, Y., Baker, A., Bridgeman, J., & Henderson, R. K. (2014) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.053 · Cited by 438
The Transportation Scale–Short Form (TS–SF)
Appel, M., Gnambs, T., Richter, T., & Green, M. C. (2015) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2014.987400 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Lorenzo-Seva, U., & ten Berge, J. M. F.
- Venue
- Methodology
- Publisher
- Hogrefe Publishing Group
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 57-64
- ISSN
- 1614-1881 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-2241
- OpenAlex
- W2157066690
- Cited by
- 1,115
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tucker's Congruence Coefficient as a Meaningful Index of Factor Similarity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1027/1614-2241.2.2.57
- The paper
- Lorenzo-Seva, U., & ten Berge, J. M. F. (2006). Tucker's Congruence Coefficient as a Meaningful Index of Factor Similarity. Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.2.2.57
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
