Cited by 127Cognitive Functions and MemoryMemory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Abilities and Testing

Does Strategic Memory Training Improve the Working Memory Performance of Younger and Older Adults?

Open access
Carretti, Barbara, Borella, Erika, De Beni, Rossana·2007·Experimental Psychology

Abstract

The paper examines the effect of strategic training on the performance of younger and older adults in an immediate list-recall and a working memory task. The experimental groups of younger and older adults received three sessions of memory training, teaching the use of mental images to improve the memorization of word lists. In contrast, the control groups were not instructed to use any particular strategy, but they were requested to carry out the memory exercises. The results showed that strategic training improved performance of both the younger and older experimental groups in the immediate list recall and in the working memory task. Of particular interest, the improvement in working memory performance of the older experimental group was comparable to that of the younger experimental group.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/1618-3169.54.4.311

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Carretti and colleagues reported that imagery strategy instruction for word lists improved performance on a subsequent word list recall task and on a WM task requiring semantic categorization.

    “Carretti and colleagues reported that imagery strategy instruction for word lists improved performance on a subsequent word list recall task, and also on a WM task requiring semantic categorization of to-be-remembered words12.”
  • The present results using the n-back paradigm align well with previous findings that explicit WM strategy instruction can be effective and that self-generated WM strategies are associated with higher task performance.

    “The present results using the n-back paradigm align well with previous findings mainly from complex span studies that have indicated that explicit WM strategy instruction can be effective10–13, and that self-generated WM strategies are associated with higher task performance9,10,14–16.”
  • Earlier studies with WM strategy intervention have not explicitly reported results from power analyses.

    “Earlier studies with WM strategy intervention have not explicitly reported results from power analyses10–13.”
  • Two previous studies reporting effect sizes have shown large effects (η2 range 0.18-0.27) with groups ranging from 27 to 79 participants.

    “the two previous studies reporting effect sizes have shown large effects ( range 0.18–0.27) with groups ranging from 27 to 79 participants12,14.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 127

Authors
Carretti, B., Borella, E., & De Beni, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Italy
Venue
Experimental Psychology
Published
2007-01
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
311-320
ISSN
  • 0949-3964 (ISSN-L)
  • 1618-3169
  • 2190-5142
OpenAlex
W2104503391
Cited by
127
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
working memory, older adults, young adults, mental imagery, list recall, age differences, cognitive aging, memory strategies
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aging, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Teaching, Vocabulary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review