The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Semianalytic Moderate‐Resolution Imaging Spectrometer algorithms for chlorophyll a and absorption with bio‐optical domains based on nitrate‐depletion temperatures
Open accessAbstract
This paper describes algorithms for retrieval of chlorophyll a concentration and phytoplankton and gelbstoff absorption coefficients for the Moderate‐Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) or sensors with similar spectral channels. The algorithms are based on a semianalytical, bio‐optical model of remote sensing reflectance, Rrs(λ). The Rrs(λ) model has two free variables, the absorption coefficient due to phytoplankton at 675 nm, aϕ(675), and the absorption coefficient due to gelbstoff at 400 nm, a g(400). The Rrs model has several parameters that are fixed or can be specified based on the region and season of the MODIS scene. These control the spectral shapes of the optical constituents of the model. Rrs(λi) values from the MODIS data processing system are placed into the model, the model is inverted, and aϕ(675), a g(400), and chlorophyll a are computed. The algorithm also derives the total absorption coefficients a(λi) and the phytoplankton absorption coefficients aϕ(λi) at the visible MODIS wavelengths. MODIS algorithms are parameterized for three different bio‐optical domains: (1) high photoprotective pigment to chlorophyll ratio and low self‐shading, which for brevity, we designate as “unpackaged”; (2) low photoprotective pigment to chlorophyll ratio and high self‐shading, which we designate as “packaged”; and (3) a transitional or global‐average type. These domains can be identified from space by comparing sea‐surface temperature to nitrogen‐depletion temperatures for each domain. Algorithm errors of more than 45% are reduced to errors of less than 30% with this approach, with the greatest effect occurring at the eastern and polar boundaries of the basins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The MERIS Case 2 water algorithm
Doerffer, R., & Schiller, H. (2007) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431160600821127 · Cited by 549
Chromophoric DOM in the coastal environment
Blough, N. V., & Del Vecchio, R. (2002) · Biogeochemistry of Marine Dissolved Organic Matter · doi:10.1016/b978-012323841-2/50012-9 · Cited by 506
Stumpf, R. P., Culver, M. E., Tester, P. A., Tomlinson, M., Kirkpatrick, G. J., Pederson, B. A., Truby, E., Ransibrahmanakul, V., & Soracco, M. (2003) · Harmful Algae · doi:10.1016/s1568-9883(02)00083-5 · Cited by 357
Siegel, D. A., Maritorena, S., Nelson, N. B., & Behrenfeld, M. J. (2005) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/2004jc002527 · Cited by 196
Cannizzaro, J. P., Carder, K. L., Chen, F. R., Heil, C. A., & Vargo, G. A. (2008) · Continental Shelf Research · doi:10.1016/j.csr.2004.04.007 · Cited by 170
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Carder, K. L., Chen, F. R., Lee, Z. P., Hawes, S. K., & Kamykowski, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1999-03-15
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- C3
- Pages
- 5403-5421
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2134293411
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Semianalytic Moderate‐Resolution Imaging Spectrometer algorithms for chlorophyll a and absorption with bio‐optical domains based on nitrate‐depletion temperatures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1998jc900082
- The paper
- Carder, K. L., Chen, F. R., Lee, Z. P., Hawes, S. K., & Kamykowski, D. (1999). Semianalytic Moderate‐Resolution Imaging Spectrometer algorithms for chlorophyll a and absorption with bio‐optical domains based on nitrate‐depletion temperatures. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998jc900082
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.