Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 412

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How ubiquitous is the dipole relationship in tropical Atlantic sea surface temperatures?

Open access
Enfield, David B., Mestas‐Nuñez, Alberto M., Mayer, Dennis A., Cid‐Serrano, Luis·1999·Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

Abstract

Several kinds of analysis are applied to sea surface temperature anomalies (SSTA) (1856–1991) to determine the degree to which SSTA of opposite sign in the tropical North and South Atlantic occur. Antisymmetric (“dipole”) configurations of SSTA on basin scales are not ubiquitous in the tropical Atlantic. Unless the data are stratified by both season and frequency, inherent dipole behavior cannot be demonstrated. Upon removing the global El Niño‐Southern Oscillation signal in SSTA (which is symmetric between the North and South Atlantic) from the data, the regions north or south of the Intertropical Convergence Zone have qualitatively different temporal variabilities and are poorly correlated. Dipole configurations do occur infrequently (12–15% of the time), but no more so than expected by chance for stochastically independent variables. Nondipole configurations that imply significant meridional SSTA gradients occur much more frequently, nearly half of the time. Cross‐spectral analysis of seasonally averaged SSTA indices for the North and South Atlantic show marginally significant coherence with antisymmetric phase in two period bands: 8–12 years for the boreal winter‐spring and 2.3 years for the boreal summer‐fall. Antisymmetric coherence is optimal for a small subregion west of Angola in the South Atlantic, with respect to SSTA of basin scale in the tropical North Atlantic. Dipole variability, even where optimal, explains only a small fraction of the total variance in tropical Atlantic SSTA (<7%).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/1998jc900109

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 412

Metadata

Authors
Enfield, D. B., Mestas‐Nuñez, A. M., Mayer, D. A., & Cid‐Serrano, L.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Published
1999-04-15
Volume
104
Issue
C4
Pages
7841-7848
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048111821
Cited by
412
References
4
FWCI
11.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How ubiquitous is the dipole relationship in tropical Atlantic sea surface temperatures? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1998jc900109
The paper
Enfield, D. B., Mestas‐Nuñez, A. M., Mayer, D. A., & Cid‐Serrano, L. (1999). How ubiquitous is the dipole relationship in tropical Atlantic sea surface temperatures? Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998jc900109

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.