The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A third‐generation wave model for coastal regions: 2. Verification
Open accessAbstract
A third‐generation spectral wave model (Simulating Waves Nearshore (SWAN)) for small‐scale, coastal regions with shallow water, (barrier) islands, tidal flats, local wind, and ambient currents is verified in stationary mode with measurements in five real field cases. These verification cases represent an increasing complexity in two‐dimensional bathymetry and added presence of currents. In the most complex of these cases, the waves propagate through a tidal gap between two barrier islands into a bathymetry of channels and shoals with tidal currents where the waves are regenerated by a local wind. The wave fields were highly variable with up to 3 orders of magnitude difference in energy scale in individual cases. The model accounts for shoaling, refraction, generation by wind, whitecapping, triad and quadruplet wave‐wave interactions, and bottom and depth‐induced wave breaking. The effect of alternative formulations of these processes is shown. In all cases a relatively large number of wave observations is available, including observations of wave directions. The average rms error in the computed significant wave height and mean wave period is 0.30 m and 0.7 s, respectively, which is 10% of the incident values for both.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Whitham, G. B., & Fowler, R. G. (1975) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3069011 · Cited by 8,179
Whiteman, K. J. (1975) · Physics Bulletin · doi:10.1088/0031-9112/26/11/028 · Cited by 7,064
A third‐generation wave model for coastal regions: 1. Model description and validation
Booij, N., Ris, R. C., & Holthuijsen, L. H. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/98jc02622 · Cited by 4,535
Self-citationMeasurements of wind-wave growth and swell decay during the Joint North Sea Wave Project (JONSWAP)
Hasselmann, K., Barnett, T. P., Bouws, E., Carlson, H. E., Cartwright, D. E., Enke, K., Ewing, J. A., Gienapp, H., Hasselmann, D., Kruseman, P., et al. (1973) · Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) · Cited by 3,565
Dynamics and Modelling of Ocean Waves
Komen, G. J., Cavaleri, L., Donelan, M., Hasselmann, K., Hasselmann, S., & Janssen, P. A. E. M. (1994) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511628955 · Cited by 1,986
SPECTRAL WAVE ATTENUATION BY BOTTOM FRICTION: THEORY
Madsen, O. S., Poon, Y., & Graber, H. C. (1988) · Coastal Engineering Proceedings · doi:10.9753/icce.v21.34 · Cited by 344
The Effect of Swell on the Growth of Wind Waves
Mitsuyasu, H., & Yoshida, Y. (1991) · Elsevier oceanography series · doi:10.1016/s0422-9894(08)70110-7 · Cited by 85
Cited by
Many Atolls May be Uninhabitable Within Decades Due to Climate Change
Storlazzi, C. D., Elias, E. P. L., & Berkowitz, P. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep14546 · Cited by 191
Metadata
- Authors
- Ris, R. C., Holthuijsen, L. H., & Booij, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1999-04-15
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- C4
- Pages
- 7667-7681
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2128506685
- Cited by
- 895
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 6.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A third‐generation wave model for coastal regions: 2. Verification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1998jc900123
- The paper
- Ris, R. C., Holthuijsen, L. H., & Booij, N. (1999). A third‐generation wave model for coastal regions: 2. Verification. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998jc900123
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.