The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Organic aerosol formation from the oxidation of biogenic hydrocarbons
Open accessAbstract
A series of outdoor chamber experiments has been used to establish and characterize the significant atmospheric aerosol‐forming potentials of the most prevalent biogenic hydrocarbons emitted by vegetation. These compounds were also studied to elucidate the effect of structure on aerosol yield for these types of compounds. Because oxidation products partition between the gas and aerosol phases, the aerosol yields of the parent biogenic hydrocarbons depend on the concentration of organic aerosol into which these products can be absorbed. For organic mass concentrations between 5 and 40 μg m−3, mass‐based yields in photooxidation experiments range from 17 to 67% for sesquiterpenes, from 2 to 23% for cyclic diolefins, from 2 to 15% for bicyclic olefins, and from 2 to 6% for the acyclic triolefin ocimene. In these photooxidation experiments, hydroxyl and nitrate radicals and ozone can contribute to consumption of the parent hydrocarbon. For bicyclic olefins (α‐pinene, β‐pinene, Δ 3‐carene, and sabinene), experiments were also carried out at daytime temperatures in a dark system in the presence of ozone or nitrate radicals alone. For ozonolysis experiments, resulting aerosol yields are less dependent on organic mass concentration, when compared to full, sunlight‐driven photooxidation. Nitrate radical experiments exhibit extremely high conversion to aerosol for β‐pinene, sabinene, and Δ 3‐carene. The relative importance of aerosol formation from each type of reaction for bicyclic olefin photooxidation is elucidated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cleaning products and air fresheners: exposure to primary and secondary air pollutants
Nazaroff, W. W., & Weschler, C. J. (2004) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.040 · Cited by 846
Airborne Particulate Matter and Human Health: A Review
Davidson, C. I., Phalen, R. F., & Solomon, P. A. (2005) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/02786820500191348 · Cited by 803
Nighttime radical observations and chemistry
Brown, S. S., & Stutz, J. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs35181a · Cited by 637
CHIMERE 2013: a model for regional atmospheric composition modelling
Menut, L., Bessagnet, B., Khvorostyanov, D., Beekmann, M., Blond, N., Colette, A., Coll, I., Curci, G., Foret, G., Hodzic, A., et al. (2013) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-6-981-2013 · Cited by 517
A review of the anthropogenic influence on biogenic secondary organic aerosol
Hoyle, C. R., Boy, M., Donahue, N. M., Fry, J. L., Glasius, M., Guenther, A., Hallar, A. G., Huff Hartz, K., Petters, M. D., Petäjä, T., et al. (2011) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-11-321-2011 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Griffin, R. J., Cocker, D. R., Flagan, R. C., & Seinfeld, J. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1999-02
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- D3
- Pages
- 3555-3567
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2130975189
- Cited by
- 725
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organic aerosol formation from the oxidation of biogenic hydrocarbons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1998jd100049
- The paper
- Griffin, R. J., Cocker, D. R., Flagan, R. C., & Seinfeld, J. H. (1999). Organic aerosol formation from the oxidation of biogenic hydrocarbons. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998jd100049
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.