The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Radiative forcing by mineral dust aerosols: Sensitivity to key variables
Abstract
We examine diurnally averaged radiative forcing by mineral dust aerosols in shortwave and longwave spectral regions using a one‐dimensional column radiation model. At the top of the atmosphere (TOA), net (shortwave plus longwave) dust radiative forcing can be positive (heating) or negative (cooling) depending on values of key variables. We derive an analytical expression for the critical single‐scattering albedo at which forcing changes sign for an atmosphere containing both cloud and aerosol layers. At the surface, net dust forcing can be positive or negative under clear‐sky conditions, whereas it is always cooling in the presence of a low‐level stratus cloud. Longwave radiative forcing is essentially zero when clouds are present. We also study the sensitivity of dust diurnally averaged forcing to the imaginary part of refractive index (k), height of the dust layer, dust particle size, and dust optical depth. These variables play different roles as follows: (1) under both clear‐ and cloudy sky conditions, net TOA forcing is more sensitive to k than net surface forcing; (2) clear‐sky longwave forcing and cloudy‐sky TOA shortwave forcing are very sensitive to the altitude of the dust layer; although clear‐sky shortwave forcing is not sensitive to it; (3) clear‐sky shortwave forcing is much more sensitive to particle size than cloudy‐sky shortwave forcing; longwave forcing is not sensitive to particle size; and (4) all forcings are sensitive to optical depth except cloudy‐sky longwave forcing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
(2017) · doi:10.5194/acp-volume17-issue3-editorial · Cited by 2,667
Radiative forcing and climate response
Hansen, J., Sato, M., & Ruedy, R. (1997) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/96jd03436 · Cited by 2,241
An Introduction to Atmospheric Radiation
Liou, K. N., & Bohren, C. F. (1981) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2914664 · Cited by 1,292
Role of mineral aerosol as a reactive surface in the global troposphere
Dentener, F. J., Carmichael, G. R., Zhang, Y., Lelieveld, J., & Crutzen, P. J. (1996) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/96jd01818 · Cited by 1,099
The influence on climate forcing of mineral aerosols from disturbed soils
Tegen, I., Lacis, A. A., & Fung, I. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/380419a0 · Cited by 992
An Introduction to Atmospheric Radiation
(1980) · International Geophysics · doi:10.1016/s0074-6142(08)x6038-3 · Cited by 930
Modeling of mineral dust in the atmosphere: Sources, transport, and optical thickness
Tegen, I., & Fung, I. (1994) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/94jd01928 · Cited by 874
Direct radiative forcing by anthropogenic airborne mineral aerosols
Sokolik, I. N., & Toon, O. B. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381681a0 · Cited by 775
Tegen, I., & Lacis, A. A. (1996) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/95jd03610 · Cited by 665
Effect of absorbing aerosols on global radiation budget
Chylek, P., & Wong, J. (1995) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/95gl00800 · Cited by 357
Cited by
Atmospheric global dust cycle and iron inputs to the ocean
Mahowald, N. M., Baker, A. R., Bergametti, G., Brooks, N., Duce, R. A., Jickells, T. D., Kubilay, N., Prospero, J. M., & Tegen, I. (2005) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2004gb002402 · Cited by 1,236
The size distribution of desert dust aerosols and its impact on the Earth system
Mahowald, N., Albani, S., Kok, J. F., Engelstaeder, S., Scanza, R., Ward, D. S., & Flanner, M. G. (2014) · Aeolian Research · doi:10.1016/j.aeolia.2013.09.002 · Cited by 744
Kok, J. F. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1014798108 · Cited by 607
Radiative effects of natural aerosols: A review
SATHEESH, S., & KRISHNAMOORTHY, K. (2005) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.12.029 · Cited by 553
Kandler, K., Benker, N., Bundke, U., Cuevas, E., Ebert, M., Knippertz, P., Rodríguez, S., Schütz, L., & Weinbruch, S. (2007) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.047 · Cited by 454
Metadata
- Authors
- Liao, H., & Seinfeld, J. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- D24
- Pages
- 31637-31645
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069261600
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 4.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiative forcing by mineral dust aerosols: Sensitivity to key variables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1998jd200036
- The paper
- Liao, H., & Seinfeld, J. H. (1998). Radiative forcing by mineral dust aerosols: Sensitivity to key variables. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998jd200036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.