The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Organic atmospheric aerosols: Review and state of the science
Open accessAbstract
Atmospheric aerosol particles are known to contain organic carbon material in variable amounts, depending on their location. In some parts of the world, organic compounds make up the majority of the total suspended particle mass. This class of particulate matter is important in a wide range of geophysical and environmental problems, ranging from local issues (e.g., pollution toxicity) to the global scale (e.g., climate change). Unfortunately, the richness of organic chemistry and the highly variable physical properties associated with both natural and anthropogenic organic particles lead to great difficulties in sampling and obtaining complete chemical information on these materials. These obstacles result in an incomplete picture of a potentially significant part of atmospheric chemistry and a correspondingly poor understanding of the geophysical and environmental effects of this aerosol. Given the paucity of quantitative molecular data, the purpose of this paper is not to quantitatively describe the importance of organic aerosols in environmental issues, but rather to present a basis for defining what data are needed. With this goal in mind, we begin with an overview of the major environmental issues known to be affected by organic aerosols, followed by a description of the distribution, sources, and chemical and physical properties of organic aerosols as they are currently understood. Methods used to collect and study organic aerosols are provided, followed by a list of outstanding scientific questions and suggestions for future research priorities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review of biomass burning: Emissions and impacts on air quality, health and climate in China
Chen, J., Li, C., Ristovski, Z., Milic, A., Gu, Y., Islam, M. S., Wang, S., Hao, J., Zhang, H., He, C., et al. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.025 · Cited by 1,262
The effect of physical and chemical aerosol properties on warm cloud droplet activation
McFiggans, G., Artaxo, P., Baltensperger, U., Coe, H., Facchini, M. C., Feingold, G., Fuzzi, S., Gysel, M., Laaksonen, A., Lohmann, U., et al. (2006) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-6-2593-2006 · Cited by 710
Chemistry and the Linkages between Air Quality and Climate Change
von Schneidemesser, E., Monks, P. S., Allan, J. D., Bruhwiler, L., Forster, P., Fowler, D., Lauer, A., Morgan, W. T., Paasonen, P., Righi, M., et al. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00089 · Cited by 522
Mass Accommodation and Chemical Reactions at Gas−Liquid Interfaces
Davidovits, P., Kolb, C. E., Williams, L. R., Jayne, J. T., & Worsnop, D. R. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040366k · Cited by 306
Ghio, A. J., Soukup, J. M., Dailey, L. A., & Madden, M. C. (2020) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.02.007 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Jacobson, M. C., Hansson, H. ‐., Noone, K. J., & Charlson, R. J.
- Venue
- Reviews of Geophysics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 267-294
- ISSN
- 0096-1043 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-1209
- 1944-9208
- OpenAlex
- W2073871217
- Cited by
- 731
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organic atmospheric aerosols: Review and state of the science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1998rg000045
- The paper
- Jacobson, M. C., Hansson, H. ‐., Noone, K. J., & Charlson, R. J. (2000). Organic atmospheric aerosols: Review and state of the science. Reviews of Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998rg000045
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.