The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Permeability of the continental crust: Implications of geothermal data and metamorphic systems
Abstract
In the upper crust, where hydraulic gradients are typically <1 MPa km−1, advective heat transport is often effective for permeabilities k ≥ 10−16 m² and advective mass (solute) transport for k ≥ 10−20 m². Regional‐scale analyses of coupled groundwater flow and heat transport in the upper crust typically infer permeabilities in the range of 10−17 to 10−14 m², so that heat advection is sometimes significant and solute advection should nearly always be significant. Analyses of metamorphic systems suggest that a geochemically significant level of permeability can exist to the base of the crust. In active metamorphic systems in the mid to lower crust, where vertical hydraulic gradients are likely >10 MPa km−1, the mean permeabilities required to accommodate the estimated metamorphic fluid fluxes decrease from ∼10−16 m² to ∼10−18 m² between 5‐ and 12‐km depth. Below ∼12 km, which broadly corresponds to the brittle‐plastic transition, mean k is effectively independent of depth at ∼10−18.5±1 m² Consideration of the permeability values inferred from thermal modeling and metamorphic fluxes suggests a quasi‐exponential decay of permeability with depth of log k ≈ −3.2 log z ‐ 14, where k is in meters squared and z is in kilometers. At mid to lower crustal depths this curve lies just below the threshold value for significant advection of heat. Such conditions may represent an optimum for metamorphism, allowing the maximum transport of fluid and solute mass that is possible without advective cooling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global Patterns of Groundwater Table Depth
Fan, Y., Li, H., & Miguez-Macho, G. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1229881 · Cited by 1,312
How faulting keeps the crust strong
Townend, J., & Zoback, M. D. (2000) · Geology · doi:10.1130/0091-7613(2000)028<0399:hfktcs>2.3.co;2 · Cited by 1,020
Permanent storage of carbon dioxide in geological reservoirs by mineral carbonation
Matter, J. M., & Kelemen, P. B. (2009) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo683 · Cited by 662
Deep slab hydration induced by bending-related variations in tectonic pressure
Faccenda, M., Gerya, T. V., & Burlini, L. (2009) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo656 · Cited by 355
Fluids in the Continental Crust
Yardley, B. W. D., & Bodnar, R. J. (2014) · Geochemical Perspectives · doi:10.7185/geochempersp.3.1 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Manning, C. E., & Ingebritsen, S. E.
- Venue
- Reviews of Geophysics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1999-02
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 127-150
- ISSN
- 0096-1043 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-1209
- 1944-9208
- OpenAlex
- W1965935874
- Cited by
- 670
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Permeability of the continental crust: Implications of geothermal data and metamorphic systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1998rg900002
- The paper
- Manning, C. E., & Ingebritsen, S. E. (1999). Permeability of the continental crust: Implications of geothermal data and metamorphic systems. Reviews of Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998rg900002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.