The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Floods, channel change, and the hyporheic zone
Abstract
We investigated the influence of flood‐induced channel changes on the hyporheic zone of 4th‐ and 5th‐order reaches of a mountain stream network. Preflood versus postflood comparisons were made in three study reaches from well networks established before and reestablished after a major flood. Flood effects were scale dependent and varied with channel constraint and the dominant channel forming process. Large changes were observed in unconstrained stream reaches where channel incision drove large changes in subsurface flow paths and the extent of the hyporheic zone. However, subreach scale differences were apparent. In the lower portion of the studied reach, channel incision lowered the water table, leading to abandonment of secondary channels, and decreased the extent of the hyporheic zone that previously extended more than 30 m into the floodplain. In contrast, the extent of the hyporheic zone increased at the head of the studied reach where channel incision steepened head gradients through a meander bend. In another unconstrained reach, lateral channel jumps dramatically altered exchange flow paths. However, the extensive hyporheic zone was maintained throughout the reach. Less change was observed in the constrained stream reach where both the depth and area of sediment available to be reworked by the flood were limited by bedrock constraining the width of the valley floor. This flood dramatically changed the hyporheic zone at the three study sites and these physical changes are expected to be biologically important, considering the role of the hyporheic zone in stream ecosystem processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Understanding Processes and Downstream Linkages of Headwater Systems
GOMI, T., SIDLE, R. C., & RICHARDSON, J. S. (2002) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0905:upadlo]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 841
Schaller, M. F., & Fan, Y. (2009) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2008jd010636 · Cited by 222
Kim, H., Rao, P. S. C., & Annable, M. D. (1997) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/97wr02227 · Cited by 177
Hydrologic Effects of Surface Coal Mining in Appalachia (U.S.)
Evans, D. M., Zipper, C. E., Hester, E. T., & Schoenholtz, S. H. (2015) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/1752-1688.12322 · Cited by 74
Ebel, B. A., Rengers, F. K., & Tucker, G. E. (2016) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2016wr019110 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Wondzell, S. M., & Swanson, F. J.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1999-02
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 555-567
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2159337923
- Cited by
- 1,432
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 54.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Floods, channel change, and the hyporheic zone. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1998wr900047
- The paper
- Wondzell, S. M., & Swanson, F. J. (1999). Floods, channel change, and the hyporheic zone. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998wr900047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.