The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ice cloud inhomogeneity: Quantifying bias in emissivity from radar observations
Abstract
In numerical models the infra‐red emissivity of ice clouds is generally computed from the optical depth. The convex relationship between these two quantities implies that if ice clouds are inhomogeneous, emissivities calculated from a grid‐box mean optical depth will be biased high. An analogous effect in stratocumulus albedo and liquid water path is compensated for by multiplying liquid water by 0.7 to calculate albedo. However it is unclear that a similar correction is valid for all cloud types. In this paper profiles of radar reflectivity in mid‐latitude winter ice clouds are analysed to derive the variability of optical depth and quantify any biases introduced into emissivities calculated from grid‐box mean optical depths. The bias is small for grid‐lengths of 10km, but the average optical depth should be multiplied by a correction factor of 0.44 for calculating emissivities in a 300km box.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A2 Uncertainty in the inhomogeneity of ice clouds within a grid box of a climate model (Carlin et al., 2002; Pomroy and Illingworth, 2000), the vertical cloud overlap, and the use of plane parallel geometry as compared to full 3D radiative transfer (Gounou and Hogan, 2007), which together amount to approximately 35%.”
From The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018 (2021) · cites this paper as Pomroy and Illingworth, 2000
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<2289:APFCGA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<2304:APFCGA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051<2434:TAOFSC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1002/qj.49712051804 · DOI
- Hogan R. J., 1999, The potential of spaceborne dual‐wavelength radar to make global measurements of cirrus clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 82, 3518
- 10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<0919:PPABFS>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<0933:PPABFS>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Paltridge G. W., 1976, Radiative Processes in Meteorology and Climatology
- 10.1029/1998JD200125 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124<0745:AEOCRP>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018
Lee, D. S., Fahey, D. W., Skowron, A., Allen, M. R., Burkhardt, U., Chen, Q., Doherty, S. J., Freeman, S., Forster, P. M., Fuglestvedt, J., et al. (2021) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834 · Cited by 1,957
Metadata
- Authors
- Pomroy, H. R., & Illingworth, A. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Reading (GB)
- Venue
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2000-07-15
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2101-2104
- ISSN
- 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8007
- OpenAlex
- W1963567265
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
- Keywords
- infrared emissivity, optical depth, radar reflectivity, cloud radiative transfer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review