Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 519

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sigmoidal morphology and eruptive solar activity

Open access
Canfield, Richard C., Hudson, Hugh S., McKenzie, David E.·1999·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

Soft X‐ray images of solar active regions frequently show S‐ or inverse‐S (sigmoidal) morphology. We have studied the Yohkoh Soft X‐Ray Telescope video movie for 1993 and 1997. We have classified active regions according to morphology (sigmoidal or non‐sigmoidal) and nature of activity (eruptive or non‐eruptive). As well, we have used NOAA sunspot areas for each region as a measure of size. We find that regions are significantly more likely to be eruptive if they are either sigmoidal or large.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/1999gl900105

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 519

Metadata

Authors
Canfield, R. C., Hudson, H. S., & McKenzie, D. E.
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
1999-03-15
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
627-630
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2108882534
Cited by
519
References
0
FWCI
25.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sigmoidal morphology and eruptive solar activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999gl900105
The paper
Canfield, R. C., Hudson, H. S., & McKenzie, D. E. (1999). Sigmoidal morphology and eruptive solar activity. Geophysical Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999gl900105

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.