The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improvement in the prediction of solar wind conditions using near‐real time solar magnetic field updates
Open accessAbstract
The Wang‐Sheeley model is an empirical model that can predict the background solar wind speed and interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) polarity. We make a number of modifications to the basic technique that greatly improve the performance and reliability of the model. First, we establish a continuous empirical function that relates magnetic expansion factor to solar wind velocity at the source surface. Second, we propagate the wind from the source surface to the Earth using the assumption of radial streams and a simple scheme to account for their interactions. Third, we develop and apply a method for identifying and removing problematic magnetograms from the Wilcox Solar Observatory (WSO). Fourth, we correct WSO line‐of‐sight magnetograms for polar field strength modulation effects that result from the annual variation in the solar b angle. Fifth, we explore a number of techniques to optimize construction of daily updated synoptic maps from the WSO magnetograms. We report on a comprehensive statistical analysis comparing Wang‐Sheeley model predictions with the WIND satellite data set during a 3‐year period centered about the May 1996 solar minimum. The predicted and observed solar wind speeds have a statistically significant correlation (∼0.4) and an average fractional deviation of 0.15. When a single (6‐month) period with large data gaps is excluded from the comparison, the solar wind speed is correctly predicted to within 10–15%. The IMF polarity is correctly predicted ∼75% of the time. The solar wind prediction technique presented here has direct applications to space weather research and forecasting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Solar wind stream interaction regions throughout the heliosphere
Richardson, I. G. (2018) · Living Reviews in Solar Physics · doi:10.1007/s41116-017-0011-z · Cited by 367
The Origin, Early Evolution and Predictability of Solar Eruptions
Green, L. M., Török, T., Vršnak, B., Manchester, W., & Veronig, A. (2018) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11214-017-0462-5 · Cited by 258
Stellar winds on the main-sequence: II. The evolution of rotation and winds
Johnstone, C. P., Güdel, M., Brott, I., & Lüftinger, T. (2015) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425301 · Cited by 229
Witasse, O., Sánchez‐Cano, B., Mays, M. L., Kajdič, P., Opgenoorth, H., Elliott, H. A., Richardson, I. G., Zouganelis, I., Zender, J., Wimmer‐Schweingruber, R. F., et al. (2017) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics · doi:10.1002/2017ja023884 · Cited by 126
A GRID OF MHD MODELS FOR STELLAR MASS LOSS AND SPIN-DOWN RATES OF SOLAR ANALOGS
Cohen, O., & Drake, J. J. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/783/1/55 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Arge, C. N., & Pizzo, V. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- A5
- Pages
- 10465-10479
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021274336
- Cited by
- 779
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improvement in the prediction of solar wind conditions using near‐real time solar magnetic field updates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999ja000262
- The paper
- Arge, C. N., & Pizzo, V. J. (2000). Improvement in the prediction of solar wind conditions using near‐real time solar magnetic field updates. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999ja000262
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.