The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Moho depth variation in southern California from teleseismic receiver functions
Abstract
The number of broadband three‐component seismic stations in southern California has more than tripled recently. In this study we use the teleseismic receiver function technique to determine the crustal thicknesses and V p/V s ratios for these stations and map out the lateral variation of Moho depth under southern California. It is shown that a receiver function can provide a very good “point” measurement of crustal thickness under a broadband station and is not sensitive to crustal P velocity. However, the crustal thickness estimated only from the delay time of the Moho P‐to‐S converted phase trades off strongly with the crustal V p/V s ratio. The ambiguity can be reduced significantly by incorporating the later multiple converted phases, namely, the PpPs and PpSs+PsPs. We propose a stacking algorithm which sums the amplitudes of receiver function at the predicted arrival times of these phases by different crustal thicknesses H and V p/V s ratios. This transforms the time domain receiver functions directly into the H‐V p/V s domain without need to identify these phases and to pick their arrival times. The best estimations of crustal thickness and V p/V s ratio are found when the three phases are stacked coherently. By stacking receiver functions from different distances and directions, effects of lateral structural variation are suppressed, and an average crustal model is obtained. Applying this technique to 84 digital broadband stations in southern California reveals that the Moho depth is 29 km on average and varies from 21 to 37 km. Deeper Mohos are found under the eastern Transverse Range, the Peninsular Range, and the Sierra Nevada Range. The central Transverse Range, however, does not have a crustal root. Thin crusts exist in the Inner California Borderland (21–22 km) and the Salton Trough (22 km). The Moho is relatively flat at the average depth in the western and central Mojave Desert and becomes shallower to the east under the Eastern California Shear Zone (ECSZ). Southern California crust has an average V p/V s ratio of 1.78, with higher ratios of 1.8 to 1.85 in the mountain ranges with Mesozoic basement and lower ratios in the Mojave Block except for the ECSZ, where the ratio increases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
North American lithospheric discontinuity structure imaged by Ps and Sp receiver functions
Abt, D. L., Fischer, K. M., French, S. W., Ford, H. A., Yuan, H., & Romanowicz, B. (2010) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2009jb006914 · Cited by 318
Moho topography in the central Andes and its geodynamic implications
Yuan, X., Sobolev, S. V., & Kind, R. (2002) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/s0012-821x(02)00589-7 · Cited by 260
Lithospheric Erosion in the Patagonian Slab Window, and Implications for Glacial Isostasy
Mark, H. F., Wiens, D. A., Ivins, E. R., Richter, A., Ben Mansour, W., Magnani, M. B., Marderwald, E., Adaros, R., & Barrientos, S. (2022) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2021gl096863 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, L., & Kanamori, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2000-02-10
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- B2
- Pages
- 2969-2980
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083266769
- Cited by
- 1,489
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Moho depth variation in southern California from teleseismic receiver functions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999jb900322
- The paper
- Zhu, L., & Kanamori, H. (2000). Moho depth variation in southern California from teleseismic receiver functions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jb900322
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.