The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bio‐optical properties and remote sensing ocean color algorithms for Antarctic Peninsula waters
Abstract
Increasing evidence suggests that bio‐optical properties of Antarctic waters are significantly different than those at temperate latitudes. Consequently, retrieval of chlorophyll concentrations from remotely sensed reflectance measurements using standard ocean color algorithms are likely to be inaccurate when applied to the Southern Ocean. Here we utilize a large bio‐optical data set (>1000 stations) collected in waters west of the Antarctic Peninsula in conjunction with the Palmer Long Term Ecological Research program to assess ocean optical properties and associated ocean color algorithms. We find that the remote sensing reflectance spectrum as a function of chlorophyll concentrations appears significantly different from the Sea‐viewing Wide Field‐of‐view Sensor (SeaWiFS) Bio‐optical Algorithm Mini‐workshop data set collected from other regions of the world's oceans. For Antarctic waters, remote sensing reflectance is significantly higher in the blue region and lower in the green region of the spectrum for high chlorophyll concentrations (> 1 mg Chl m−3). Therefore applying general processing algorithms for both Coastal Zone Color Scanner and SeaWiFS in these Antarctic waters results in an underestimate of chlorophyll by roughly a factor of 2. From modeled estimates of absorption and backscattering we hypothesize that both low chlorophyll‐specific absorption and low backscattering contribute to the high reflectance ratios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Marine pelagic ecosystems: the West Antarctic Peninsula
Ducklow, H. W., Baker, K., Martinson, D. G., Quetin, L. B., Ross, R. M., Smith, R. C., Stammerjohn, S. E., Vernet, M., & Fraser, W. (2007) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1955 · Cited by 677
Self-citationBiospheric Primary Production During an ENSO Transition
Behrenfeld, M. J., Randerson, J. T., McClain, C. R., Feldman, G. C., Los, S. O., Tucker, C. J., Falkowski, P. G., Field, C. B., Frouin, R., Esaias, W. E., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1055071 · Cited by 649
Global and regional evaluation of the SeaWiFS chlorophyll data set
Gregg, W. W., & Casey, N. W. (2004) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2003.12.012 · Cited by 344
Glacial meltwater dynamics in coastal waters west of the Antarctic peninsula
Dierssen, H. M., Smith, R. C., & Vernet, M. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.032206999 · Cited by 276
Self-citationNegative feedback in the cold: ice retreat produces new carbon sinks in Antarctica
PECK, L. S., BARNES, D. K. A., COOK, A. J., FLEMING, A. H., & CLARKE, A. (2010) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02071.x · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Dierssen, H. M., & Smith, R. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2000-11-15
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- C11
- Pages
- 26301-26312
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005466850
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bio‐optical properties and remote sensing ocean color algorithms for Antarctic Peninsula waters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999jc000296
- The paper
- Dierssen, H. M., & Smith, R. C. (2000). Bio‐optical properties and remote sensing ocean color algorithms for Antarctic Peninsula waters. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jc000296
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.