The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Partitioning of the organic aerosol component between fog droplets and interstitial air
Abstract
Limited information is available on the nature of organic compounds in the tropospheric aerosol and their effect on aerosol hygroscopic properties and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) ability. Here we analyze samples of liquid droplets and interstitial aerosol, concurrently collected during fog episodes, to determine how the organic compounds are partitioned between the two reservoirs. By comparing the nature and concentration of different organic carbon classes found in the two reservoirs, we find that fog acts as an efficient separator for carbon (C) species on the basis of their chemical properties, with polar water soluble species representing the greater part of total C within fog droplets, and water insoluble C species preferentially found in the interstitial reservoir. Water‐soluble organic species are scavenged by fog droplets to a comparable extent to major inorganic ions and are therefore expected to play an important role in the droplet nucleation process. The main classes of water soluble organic carbon (WSOC) identified in fog water and interstitial aerosol by the techniques traditionally used in aerosol analysis are aliphatic dicarboxylic acids, sugars, aliphatic alcohols, and aliphatic carboxylic acids. However, such species, ∼120 individual compounds, only account for a few percent (<5% on average) of total WSOC. A new class of water soluble macromolecular compounds (MMC), detected in aerosol samples from different areas of the globe, are found to constitute a large fraction (∼40% on average) of WSOC in the fog system (fog droplets plus interstitial aerosol) and represent the main class of water soluble species identified. More than 50% of WSOC still remains undetermined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The effect of physical and chemical aerosol properties on warm cloud droplet activation
McFiggans, G., Artaxo, P., Baltensperger, U., Coe, H., Facchini, M. C., Feingold, G., Fuzzi, S., Gysel, M., Laaksonen, A., Lohmann, U., et al. (2006) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-6-2593-2006 · Cited by 710
Self-citationWhen Aerosol Sulfate Goes Up, So Does Oxalate: Implication for the Formation Mechanisms of Oxalate
Yu, J. Z., Huang, X.-F., Xu, J., & Hu, M. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es049559f · Cited by 287
Enhanced toxicity of aerosol in fog conditions in the Po Valley, Italy
Decesari, S., Sowlat, M. H., Hasheminassab, S., Sandrini, S., Gilardoni, S., Facchini, M. C., Fuzzi, S., & Sioutas, C. (2017) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-17-7721-2017 · Cited by 66
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Facchini, M. C., Fuzzi, S., Zappoli, S., Andracchio, A., Gelencsér, A., Kiss, G., Krivácsy, Z., Mészáros, E., Hansson, H., Alsberg, T., & Zebühr, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- D21
- Pages
- 26821-26832
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976606419
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Partitioning of the organic aerosol component between fog droplets and interstitial air. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999jd900349
- The paper
- Facchini, M. C., Fuzzi, S., Zappoli, S., Andracchio, A., Gelencsér, A., Kiss, G., Krivácsy, Z., Mészáros, E., Hansson, H., Alsberg, T., & Zebühr, Y. (1999). Partitioning of the organic aerosol component between fog droplets and interstitial air. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jd900349
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.