Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 211

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Partitioning of the organic aerosol component between fog droplets and interstitial air

Facchini, Maria Cristina, Fuzzi, Sandro, Zappoli, Sergio, Andracchio, Antonella, Gelencsér, András, Kiss, Gyula, Krivácsy, Zoltán, Mészáros, Ernô, Hansson, Hans‐Christen, Alsberg, Tomas, Zebühr, Yngve·1999·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Limited information is available on the nature of organic compounds in the tropospheric aerosol and their effect on aerosol hygroscopic properties and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) ability. Here we analyze samples of liquid droplets and interstitial aerosol, concurrently collected during fog episodes, to determine how the organic compounds are partitioned between the two reservoirs. By comparing the nature and concentration of different organic carbon classes found in the two reservoirs, we find that fog acts as an efficient separator for carbon (C) species on the basis of their chemical properties, with polar water soluble species representing the greater part of total C within fog droplets, and water insoluble C species preferentially found in the interstitial reservoir. Water‐soluble organic species are scavenged by fog droplets to a comparable extent to major inorganic ions and are therefore expected to play an important role in the droplet nucleation process. The main classes of water soluble organic carbon (WSOC) identified in fog water and interstitial aerosol by the techniques traditionally used in aerosol analysis are aliphatic dicarboxylic acids, sugars, aliphatic alcohols, and aliphatic carboxylic acids. However, such species, ∼120 individual compounds, only account for a few percent (<5% on average) of total WSOC. A new class of water soluble macromolecular compounds (MMC), detected in aerosol samples from different areas of the globe, are found to constitute a large fraction (∼40% on average) of WSOC in the fog system (fog droplets plus interstitial aerosol) and represent the main class of water soluble species identified. More than 50% of WSOC still remains undetermined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/1999jd900349

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
Facchini, M. C., Fuzzi, S., Zappoli, S., Andracchio, A., Gelencsér, A., Kiss, G., Krivácsy, Z., Mészáros, E., Hansson, H., Alsberg, T., & Zebühr, Y.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
1999-11
Volume
104
Issue
D21
Pages
26821-26832
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976606419
Cited by
211
References
0
FWCI
9.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Partitioning of the organic aerosol component between fog droplets and interstitial air. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999jd900349
The paper
Facchini, M. C., Fuzzi, S., Zappoli, S., Andracchio, A., Gelencsér, A., Kiss, G., Krivácsy, Z., Mészáros, E., Hansson, H., Alsberg, T., & Zebühr, Y. (1999). Partitioning of the organic aerosol component between fog droplets and interstitial air. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jd900349

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.