Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Photochemistry of HOx in the upper troposphere at northern midlatitudes

Open access
Jaeglé, L., Jacob, D. J., Brune, W. H., Faloona, I., Tan, D., Heikes, B. G., Kondo, Y., Sachse, G. W., Anderson, B., Gregory, G. L., Singh, H. B., Pueschel, R., Ferry, G., Blake, D. R., Shetter, R. E.·2000·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

The factors controlling the concentrations of HOx radicals (= OH + peroxy) in the upper troposphere (8–12 km) are examined using concurrent aircraft observations of OH, HO 2, H 2 O 2, CH 3 OOH, and CH 2 O made during the Subsonic Assessment Ozone and Nitrogen Oxide Experiment (SONEX) at northern midlatitudes in the fall. These observations, complemented by concurrent measurements of O 3, H 2 O, NO, peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN), HNO 3, CH 4, CO, acetone, hydrocarbons, actinic fluxes, and aerosols, allow a highly constrained mass balance analysis of HOx and of the larger chemical family HOy (= HOx + 2 H 2 O 2 + 2 CH 3 OOH + HNO 2 + HNO 4). Observations of OH and HO 2 are successfully simulated to within 40% by a diel steady state model constrained with observed H 2 O 2 and CH 3 OOH. The model captures 85% of the observed HOx variance, which is driven mainly by the concentrations of NOx (= NO + NO 2) and by the strength of the HOx primary sources. Exceptions to the good agreement between modeled and observed HOx are at sunrise and sunset, where the model is too low by factors of 2–5, and inside cirrus clouds, where the model is too high by factors of 1.2–2. Heterogeneous conversion of NO 2 to HONO on aerosols (γ NO2 = 10−3) during the night followed by photolysis of HONO could explain part of the discrepancy at sunrise. Heterogeneous loss of HO 2 on ice crystals (γ ice_HO2 = 0.025) could explain the discrepancy in cirrus. Primary sources of HOx from O(1D)+H 2 O and acetone photolysis were of comparable magnitude during SONEX. The dominant sinks of HOy were OH+HO 2 (NOx<50 parts per trillion by volume (pptv)) and OH+HNO 4 (NOx>50 pptv). Observed H 2 O 2 concentrations are reproduced by model calculations to within 50% if one allows in the model for heterogeneous conversion of HO 2 to H 2 O 2 on aerosols (γ HO2 = 0.2). Observed CH 3 OOH concentrations are underestimated by a factor of 2 on average. Observed CH 2 O concentrations were usually below the 50 pptv detection limit, consistent with model results; however, frequent occurrences of high values in the observations (up to 350 pptv) are not captured by the model. These high values are correlated with high CH 3 OH and with cirrus clouds. Heterogeneous oxidation of CH 3 OH to CH 2 O on aerosols or ice crystals might provide an explanation (γ ice_CH3OH ∼ 0.01 would be needed).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/1999jd901016

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Jaeglé, L., Jacob, D. J., Brune, W. H., Faloona, I., Tan, D., Heikes, B. G., Kondo, Y., Sachse, G. W., Anderson, B., Gregory, G. L., Singh, H. B., Pueschel, R., Ferry, G., Blake, D. R., & Shetter, R. E.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2000-02
Volume
105
Issue
D3
Pages
3877-3892
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114554876
Cited by
193
References
0
FWCI
14.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photochemistry of HOx in the upper troposphere at northern midlatitudes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999jd901016
The paper
Jaeglé, L., Jacob, D. J., Brune, W. H., Faloona, I., Tan, D., Heikes, B. G., Kondo, Y., Sachse, G. W., Anderson, B., Gregory, G. L., Singh, H. B., Pueschel, R., Ferry, G., Blake, D. R., & Shetter, R. E. (2000). Photochemistry of HOx in the upper troposphere at northern midlatitudes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jd901016

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.