The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Minor flux adjustment near mixing ratio extremes for simplified yet highly accurate monotonic calculation of tracer advection
Open accessAbstract
A simplified but very accurate method for calculating advection of mixing ratios in a mass conservative and absolutely monotonic manner in divergent or nondivergent multidimensional flows is presented. This scheme uses a second‐order‐accurate, upstream approximation with monotone limiters and additionally adjusts fluxes at two cell edges around local extremes of a tracer distribution to significantly improve overall advection calculations. The minor flux adjustment slightly aggregates mass around local peaks in a manner which counters the inherent numerical diffusion associated with most numerical advection algorithms when advecting poorly resolved features. When advecting tracer shapes which are resolved by fewer than 10–20 grid cells, this scheme is significantly more accurate than higher‐order algorithms for a wide range of test problems. For well‐resolved tracer distributions this algorithm is very accurate and usually preserves local peak and minimum values almost perfectly. The scheme is positive‐definite, but negative values can be advected with no modifications. A generalized algorithm and FORTRAN subroutine is presented for advecting mixing ratios or other conservative quantities through variable‐spaced grids of one to three dimensions, including deformational flows. One‐ and two‐dimensional tests are presented and compared with other higher‐order algorithms. The computational requirements of this algorithm are significantly lower than those of other higher‐order and less accurate schemes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Worldwide health effects of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident
Ten Hoeve, J. E., & Jacobson, M. Z. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee22019a · Cited by 368
Jacobson, M. Z. (2010) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2009jd013795 · Cited by 337
A review of operational, regional-scale, chemical weather forecasting models in Europe
Kukkonen, J., Olsson, T., Schultz, D. M., Baklanov, A., Klein, T., Miranda, A. I., Monteiro, A., Hirtl, M., Tarvainen, V., Boy, M., et al. (2012) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-12-1-2012 · Cited by 337
Climate-driven ground-level ozone extreme in the fall over the Southeast United States
Zhang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1602563113 · Cited by 132
Lefebvre, W., Vercauteren, J., Schrooten, L., Janssen, S., Degraeuwe, B., Maenhaut, W., de Vlieger, I., Vankerkom, J., Cosemans, G., Mensink, C., et al. (2011) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.033 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Walcek, C. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- D7
- Pages
- 9335-9348
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020634245
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Minor flux adjustment near mixing ratio extremes for simplified yet highly accurate monotonic calculation of tracer advection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999jd901142
- The paper
- Walcek, C. J. (2000). Minor flux adjustment near mixing ratio extremes for simplified yet highly accurate monotonic calculation of tracer advection. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jd901142
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.