The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The surface‐bounded atmospheres of Mercury and the Moon
Abstract
Surface‐bounded exospheres have been detected at the Moon, Mercury, and Europa and almost certainly exist about other objects. Historically, the first of these systems to be observed was the lunar exosphere, where He and Ar were detected by the Apollo spacecraft. The Hermean exosphere is archetypical of these systems in that it is part of a coupled system including the surface and magnetosphere interacting dynamically with the solar wind and fields. Studies of the Hermean exosphere heretofore have neglected or only superficially considered these interactions. We will review the current state of knowledge of the exospheres of Mercury and the Moon and discuss areas in which our knowledge is most incomplete. We will focus on the exosphere as part of a coupled system including the surface at its base and the particle, field, and interplanetary environment as both a source and sink for neutrals. Apollo era instruments made unambiguous detections of 36 Ar, 40 Ar, and He and placed stringent upper limits on other species [Hodges, 1975; Hodges and Hoffman, 1973]. Post‐Apollo work began with the discovery of Na and K using ground‐based techniques [Potter and Morgan, 1988]. There have also been attempts to use the International Ultraviolet Explorer and the Hubble Space Telescope to detect additional species. The Mariner 10 mission included two encounters with Mercury and one distant flyby in 1974–1975: (1) March 29, 1974 (nightside pass with closest approach at 723‐km altitude), (2) September 21, 1974 (distant dayside pass), and (3) March 16, 1975 (nightside pass with closest approach at 327‐km altitude). Since then there has been no other spacecraft mission to Mercury. In the 2 decades since the Mariner 10 mission, slow but steady progress has been made in understanding the Hermean system, but our knowledge of this innermost terrestrial planet is extremely limited. It is clear that many theories about the origin and evolution of Mercury that were proposed before Mariner 10 are inconsistent with what we now know about the system. Substantial progress will be made only by returning to the planet. This review aims to present a tool for mission planning as well as an introduction and overview of the exosphere.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The behavior of volatiles on the lunar surface
Watson, K., Murray, B. C., & Brown, H. (1961) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/jz066i009p03033 · Cited by 491
The lunar atmosphere: History, status, current problems and context
Stern, S. A. (1999) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/1999rg900005 · Cited by 405
Cited by
BepiColombo—Comprehensive exploration of Mercury: Mission overview and science goals
Benkhoff, J., van Casteren, J., Hayakawa, H., Fujimoto, M., Laakso, H., Novara, M., Ferri, P., Middleton, H. R., & Ziethe, R. (2010) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2009.09.020 · Cited by 494
Metadata
- Authors
- Killen, R. M., & Ip, W.
- Venue
- Reviews of Geophysics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 361-406
- ISSN
- 0096-1043 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-1209
- 1944-9208
- OpenAlex
- W2020362805
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The surface‐bounded atmospheres of Mercury and the Moon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999rg900001
- The paper
- Killen, R. M., & Ip, W. (1999). The surface‐bounded atmospheres of Mercury and the Moon. Reviews of Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999rg900001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.