The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian theory of probabilistic forecasting via deterministic hydrologic model
Abstract
Rational decision making (for flood warning, navigation, or reservoir systems) requires that the total uncertainty about a hydrologic predictand (such as river stage, discharge, or runoff volume) be quantified in terms of a probability distribution, conditional on all available information and knowledge. Hydrologic knowledge is typically embodied in a deterministic catchment model. Fundamentals are presented of a Bayesian forecasting system (BFS) for producing a probabilistic forecast of a hydrologic predictand via any deterministic catchment model. The BFS decomposes the total uncertainty into input uncertainty and hydrologic uncertainty, which are quantified independently and then integrated into a predictive (Bayes) distribution. This distribution results from a revision of a prior (climatic) distribution, is well calibrated, and has a nonnegative ex ante economic value. The BFS is compared with Monte Carlo simulation and “ensemble forecasting” technique, none of which can alone produce a probabilistic forecast that meets requirements of rational decision making, but each can serve as a component of the BFS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bernardo, J. M., & Smith, A. F. M. (1994) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316870 · Cited by 2,178
Cited by
Probabilistic Forecasts, Calibration and Sharpness
Gneiting, T., Balabdaoui, F., & Raftery, A. E. (2007) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00587.x · Cited by 1,783
A review of advances in flash flood forecasting
Hapuarachchi, H. A. P., Wang, Q. J., & Pagano, T. C. (2011) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.8040 · Cited by 560
Salas, J. D., Govindaraju, R. S., Anderson, M., Arabi, M., Francés, F., Suarez, W., Lavado-Casimiro, W. S., & Green, T. R. (2014) · Modern Water Resources Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-595-8_1 · Cited by 290
Das, J., & Umamahesh, N. V. (2017) · Journal of Hydrologic Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001571 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Krzysztofowicz, R.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2739-2750
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2014325697
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian theory of probabilistic forecasting via deterministic hydrologic model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999wr900099
- The paper
- Krzysztofowicz, R. (1999). Bayesian theory of probabilistic forecasting via deterministic hydrologic model. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999wr900099
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.