The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Upper mantle seismic wave velocity: Effects of realistic partial melt geometries
Abstract
We investigate seismic wave velocity reduction resulting from the presence of partial melt in the upper mantle. The amount of shear and bulk modulus reduction produced by the presence of a connected network of realistically shaped and naturally organized melt inclusions is found using finite element calculations. The geometries of the inclusions are taken directly from laboratory experiments of mantle melting, with finite element meshes constructed to conform to these shapes. The shear and bulk moduli of the composite material are found for both the unrelaxed (isolated inclusions) and relaxed (pressure equalized inclusions) cases by assigning appropriate material properties to the fluid. Modulus reduction from deformation simulations of a solid containing realistically shaped and ellipse‐shaped melt inclusions quantify the effect of melt pocket cuspateness and melt pocket organization on seismic velocity reduction. The three‐dimensional response is estimated from two‐dimensional distributions of the melt phase by determining the mode II and mode III components of elastic modulus reduction separately and summing their effects. In general, cuspate and naturally organized melt inclusions cause greater velocity reduction. It is shown that VP and VS reduction per percent partial melt are at least 3.6% and 7.9%, respectively. Even higher values for velocity reduction are possible above 1% melt fraction if melt exists only in tubules below 1% melt fraction. The lower, more conservative values of velocity reduction are ∼70% greater for VP and 84% greater for VS than the analytically determined values for ellipsoidal inclusions. Somewhat greater effects are possible if nonrandom organization of melt occurs on scales greater than our model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Schmandt, B., & Humphreys, E. (2010) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2010.06.047 · Cited by 342
Self-citationLow-velocity zone atop the 410-km seismic discontinuity in the northwestern United States
Alex Song, T.-R., Helmberger, D. V., & Grand, S. P. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02231 · Cited by 287
Dichotomy in crustal melting on early Mars inferred from antipodal effect
Zhang, L., Zhang, J., & Mitchell, R. N. (2022) · The Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100280 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Hammond, W. C., & Humphreys, E. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2000-05-10
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- B5
- Pages
- 10975-10986
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054274326
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Upper mantle seismic wave velocity: Effects of realistic partial melt geometries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2000jb900041
- The paper
- Hammond, W. C., & Humphreys, E. D. (2000). Upper mantle seismic wave velocity: Effects of realistic partial melt geometries. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jb900041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.