The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Factors controlling normal fault offset in an ideal brittle layer
Open accessAbstract
We study the physical processes controlling the development and evolution of normal faults by analyzing numerical experiments of extension of an ideal two‐dimensional elastic‐plastic (brittle) layer floating on an inviscid fluid. The yield stress of the layer is the sum of the layer cohesion and its frictional stress. Faults are initiated by a small plastic flaw in the layer. We get finite fault offset when we make fault cohesion decrease with strain. Even in this highly idealized system we vary six physical parameters: the initial cohesion of the layer, the thickness of the layer, the rate of cohesion reduction with plastic strain, the friction coefficient, the flaw size and the fault width. We obtain two main types of faulting behavior: (1) multiple major faults with small offset and (2) single major fault that can develop very large offset. We show that only two parameters control these different types of faulting patterns: (1) the brittle layer thickness for a given cohesion and (2) the rate of cohesion reduction with strain. For a large brittle layer thickness (>22 km with 44 MPa of cohesion), extension always leads to multiple faults distributed over the width of the layer. For a smaller brittle layer thickness the fault pattern is dependent on the rate of fault weakening: a very slow rate of weakening leads to a very large offset fault and a fast rate of weakening leads to an asymmetric graben and eventually to a very large offset fault. When the offset is very large, the model produces major features of the pattern of topography and faulting seen in some metamorphic core complexes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rheology and strength of the lithosphere
Burov, E. B. (2011) · Marine and Petroleum Geology · doi:10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2011.05.008 · Cited by 470
Modes of faulting at mid-ocean ridges
Buck, W. R., Lavier, L. L., & Poliakov, A. N. B. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03358 · Cited by 455
Self-citationCrameri, F., Schmeling, H., Golabek, G. J., Duretz, T., Orendt, R., Buiter, S. J. H., May, D. A., Kaus, B. J. P., Gerya, T. V., & Tackley, P. J. (2012) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.2012.05388.x · Cited by 411
Continental and oceanic core complexes
Whitney, D. L., Teyssier, C., Rey, P., & Buck, W. R. (2013) · Geological Society of America Bulletin · doi:10.1130/b30754.1 · Cited by 379
Self-citationRole of melt supply in oceanic detachment faulting and formation of megamullions
Tucholke, B. E., Behn, M. D., Buck, W. R., & Lin, J. (2008) · Geology · doi:10.1130/g24639a.1 · Cited by 309
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lavier, L. L., Buck, W. R., & Poliakov, A. N. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2000-10-10
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- B10
- Pages
- 23431-23442
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023781184
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors controlling normal fault offset in an ideal brittle layer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2000jb900108
- The paper
- Lavier, L. L., Buck, W. R., & Poliakov, A. N. B. (2000). Factors controlling normal fault offset in an ideal brittle layer. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jb900108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.