Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 430

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three‐dimensional terrain: 2. Numerical predictions and experimental tests

Open access
Denlinger, Roger P., Iverson, Richard M.·2001·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

Numerical solutions of the equations describing flow of variably fluidized Coulomb mixtures predict key features of dry granular avalanches and water‐saturated debris flows measured in physical experiments. These features include time‐dependent speeds, depths, and widths of flows as well as the geometry of resulting deposits. Three‐dimensional (3‐D) boundary surfaces strongly influence flow dynamics because transverse shearing and cross‐stream momentum transport occur where topography obstructs or redirects motion. Consequent energy dissipation can cause local deceleration and deposition, even on steep slopes. Velocities of surge fronts and other discontinuities that develop as flows cross 3‐D terrain are predicted accurately by using a Riemann solution algorithm. The algorithm employs a gravity wave speed that accounts for different intensities of lateral stress transfer in regions of extending and compressing flow and in regions with different degrees of fluidization. Field observations and experiments indicate that flows in which fluid plays a significant role typically have high‐friction margins with weaker interiors partly fluidized by pore pressure. Interaction of the strong perimeter and weak interior produces relatively steep‐sided, flat‐topped deposits. To simulate these effects, we compute pore pressure distributions using an advection‐diffusion model with enhanced diffusivity near flow margins. Although challenges remain in evaluating pore pressure distributions in diverse geophysical flows, Riemann solutions of the depth‐averaged 3‐D Coulomb mixture equations provide a powerful tool for interpreting and predicting flow behavior. They provide a means of modeling debris flows, rock avalanches, pyroclastic flows, and related phenomena without invoking and calibrating rheological parameters that have questionable physical significance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2000jb900330

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 430

Metadata

Authors
Denlinger, R. P., & Iverson, R. M.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
2001-01-10
Volume
106
Issue
B1
Pages
553-566
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966077557
Cited by
430
References
1
FWCI
63.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three‐dimensional terrain: 2. Numerical predictions and experimental tests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2000jb900330
The paper
Denlinger, R. P., & Iverson, R. M. (2001). Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three‐dimensional terrain: 2. Numerical predictions and experimental tests. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jb900330

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.