The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A model for estimating bulk refractive index from the optical backscattering ratio and the implications for understanding particle composition in case I and case II waters
Abstract
A model based on Mie theory is described that estimates bulk participate refractive index from in situ optical measurements alone. Bulk refractive index is described in terms of the backscattering ratio and the hyperbolic slope of the particle size distribution (PSD). The PSD slope ξ is estimated from the hyperbolic slope of the particulate attenuation spectrum γ according to the relationship γ ≈ ξ − 3, verified with Mie theory. Thus the required in situ measurements are the particulate backscattering coefficient, the total particulate scattering coefficient, and the particulate attenuation coefficient. These parameters can be measured with commercially available instrumentation with rapid sampling rates and real‐time data return. Application of the model to data from the Gulf of California yielded results that agreed with expectations, e.g., predicted was 1.04–1.05 in the chlorophyll maximum and 1.14–1.18 near sediments. Below the chlorophyll maximum in case I type waters, predicted values were between 1.10 and 1.12, suggesting the presence of a significant inorganic mineral component in the background or detrital organic particles with low water content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(2014) · doi:10.1201/b17118 · Cited by 57,706
Cited by
Monitoring turbidity in Tampa Bay using MODIS/Aqua 250-m imagery
Chen, Z., Hu, C., & Muller-Karger, F. (2007) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.12.019 · Cited by 320
Cannizzaro, J. P., Carder, K. L., Chen, F. R., Heil, C. A., & Vargo, G. A. (2008) · Continental Shelf Research · doi:10.1016/j.csr.2004.04.007 · Cited by 170
Sinking organic particles in the ocean—flux estimates from in situ optical devices
Giering, S. L. C., Cavan, E. L., Basedow, S. L., Briggs, N., Burd, A. B., Darroch, L. J., Guidi, L., Irisson, J.-O., Iversen, M. H., Kiko, R., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00834 · Cited by 143
Green, R. E., Sosik, H. M., Olson, R. J., & DuRand, M. D. (2003) · Applied Optics · doi:10.1364/ao.42.000526 · Cited by 88
Amin, R., Zhou, J., Gilerson, A., Gross, B., Moshary, F., & Ahmed, S. (2009) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.17.009126 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Twardowski, M. S., Boss, E., Macdonald, J. B., Pegau, W. S., Barnard, A. H., & Zaneveld, J. R. V.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2001-07-15
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- C7
- Pages
- 14129-14142
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010727962
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A model for estimating bulk refractive index from the optical backscattering ratio and the implications for understanding particle composition in case I and case II waters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2000jc000404
- The paper
- Twardowski, M. S., Boss, E., Macdonald, J. B., Pegau, W. S., Barnard, A. H., & Zaneveld, J. R. V. (2001). A model for estimating bulk refractive index from the optical backscattering ratio and the implications for understanding particle composition in case I and case II waters. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jc000404
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.