Offshore propagation of eddy kinetic energy in the California Current
Open accessAbstract
Low‐pass‐filtered velocities obtained from surface drifters and surface geostrophic velocities estimated from TOPEX/Poseidon altimeter data have recently revealed a clear and robust seasonal cycle in the surface eddy kinetic energy (EKE) in the California Current (CC) [Kelly et al., 1998; Strub and James, 2000]. The seasonal cycle begins in spring when a surface‐intensified baroclinic equatorward jet develops next to the coast in response to strong upwelling favorable winds. This jet, and a developing eddy field, then moves offshore during summer and fall. The EKE maximum associated with the jet progresses only as far as 127°W, beyond which it decreases rapidly. This is a robust characteristic of the seasonal cycle that has been previously attributed only to an unspecified dissipation process. To investigate this aspect of the surface EKE, a multiyear simulation of the CC is carried out using the Dietrich/Center for Air‐Sea Technology primitive equation regional ocean model [Dietrich, 1997]. The simulation accurately reproduces many aspects of the observed annual cycle, including the offshore propagation of the EKE at the surface. The model results indicate that the decrease of surface EKE west of 127°W in the simulation is not due to dissipation but rather is caused by the vertical redistribution of EKE to the deep ocean. This redistribution occurs through the transformation of kinetic energy from the vertical shear flow to the vertical mean flow. The transformation is a non…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The absence of beta effect is presumably responsible for eddy kinetic energy levels above typical values found in the real ocean for EBUS sectors.
“but is presumably responsible for eddy kinetic energy (EKE) levels above typical values found in the real ocean for EBUS sectors (Haney et al. 2001;Marchesiello et al. 2003;Gruber et al. 2011).”
From Competition between Baroclinic Instability and Ekman Transport under Varying Buoyancy Forcings in Upwelling Systems: An Idealized Analog to the Southern Ocean (2021) · cites this paper as Haney et al. 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thomsen, S., Capet, X., & Echevin, V. (2021) · Journal of Physical Oceanography · doi:10.1175/jpo-d-20-0294.1 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Haney, R. L., Hale, R. A., & Dietrich, D. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2001-06-15
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- C6
- Pages
- 11709-11717
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067761131
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
- Keywords
- eddy kinetic energy, California Current, seasonal cycle, baroclinic instability, vertical shear, coastal upwelling, Northeast Pacific, surface drifter, TOPEX/Poseidon altimetry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review