Boundary layer vertical exchange processes and the mass budget of ozone: Observations and model results
Open accessAbstract
An Eulerian chemical model is used to assess the relative importance of a variety of processes associated with producing high surface ozone episodes during selected periods of the North American Research Strategy for Tropospheric Ozone (NARSTO) 1995 field campaign over the northeastern United States. A comparison of the observed and predicted hourly surface ozone mixing ratios showed that the model qualitatively reproduced the observed ozone trends over the northeastern United States. The model had a mean hourly bias of ∼15 ppb with a wide range of skill compared to individual observing stations clustered around one node. The simulated mass budget tendency terms are compared for days with low ozone values immediately followed by days with high values. The later days showed observed and simulated ozone mixing ratios aloft to be of order twice that found on preceding days, although the associated chemical mix appeared to have relatively little potential for the subsequent generation of “new” ozone. Under conditions of shallow mixing over urban regions, simulated surface ozone production rates were negative (a net loss) throughout much of the day with convective mixing bringing newly produced ozone from aloft to the surface. It is noted that surface ozone levels appeared to be relatively insensitive to mixing layer growth rates.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The lack of detailed vertical measurements of air pollutants, especially in the long-lived high-latitude stable boundary layer, is partly responsible for the inadequacy of conventional descriptions.
“This is partly due to the lack of detailed vertical measurements of air pollutants, especially in the long-lived high-latitude SBL (Berkowitz et al., 2000).”
From In situ vertical observations of the layered structure of air pollution in a continental high-latitude urban boundary layer during winter (2025) · cites this paper as Berkowitz et al., 2000
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 35 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Berkowitz, C. M., Fast, J. D., & Easter, R. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- D11
- Pages
- 14789-14805
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2058745162
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Keywords
- tropospheric ozone, convective mixing, ozone production rate, northeastern United States, urban ozone, mixing layer growth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review