Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 527

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Temporal and spatial scales of observed soil moisture variations in the extratropics

Entin, Jared K., Robock, Alan, Vinnikov, Konstantin Y., Hollinger, Steven E., Liu, Suxia, Namkhai, A.·2000·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Scales of soil moisture variations are important for understanding patterns of climate change, for developing and evaluating land surface models, for designing surface soil moisture observation networks, and for determining the appropriate resolution for satellite‐based remote sensing instruments for soil moisture. Here we take advantage of a new archive of in situ soil moisture observations from Illinois and Iowa in the United States, and from Russia, Mongolia, and China, to evaluate the observed temporal and spatial scales of soil moisture variations. We separate the variance into two components, the very small scale, determined by soils, topography, vegetation, and root structure, and the large scale forced by the atmosphere. This larger scale, determined by precipitation and evaporation patterns, is of interest for global climate modeling. We characterize the small scale as white noise for our analysis, keeping in mind that it is an important component of soil moisture variations for other problems. We find that the atmospheric spatial scale for all regions is about 500 km. The atmospheric temporal scale is about 2 months for the top 1‐m soil layer. The temporal scale for the top 10‐cm layer is slightly less than 2 months. The white noise component of the variance for temporal variations ranges from 50% for the top 10 cm to 20–40% for the top 1 m. For spatial variations the white noise component is the same for all depths but varies with region from 30% for Illinois to around 70% for Mongolia. Nevertheless, the red noise (atmospheric component) can be seen in all regions. These results are for Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes and would not necessarily apply to other latitudes. The results are based on observations taken from grassland or agricultural areas, and may not be similar to those of areas with other vegetation types. In China, a region with substantial latitudinal variation, the temporal scale for the top 1 m varies from 1 month in the south to 2.5 months in the north, demonstrating the control of potential evaporation on the temporal scales. Seasonal analysis of the scales of soil moisture for Illinois shows that during the winter the temporal scales are long, though the spatial scales are short. We suggest that these variations are both attributable to the seasonal cycle of potential evaporation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2000jd900051

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 527

Metadata

Authors
Entin, J. K., Robock, A., Vinnikov, K. Y., Hollinger, S. E., Liu, S., & Namkhai, A.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2000-05
Volume
105
Issue
D9
Pages
11865-11877
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090693710
Cited by
527
References
1
FWCI
21.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporal and spatial scales of observed soil moisture variations in the extratropics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2000jd900051
The paper
Entin, J. K., Robock, A., Vinnikov, K. Y., Hollinger, S. E., Liu, S., & Namkhai, A. (2000). Temporal and spatial scales of observed soil moisture variations in the extratropics. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900051

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.