Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 169

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Data composites of airborne observations of tropospheric ozone and its precursors

Open access
Emmons, Louisa K., Hauglustaine, Didier A., Müller, Jean‐François, Carroll, Mary Anne, Brasseur, Guy P., Brunner, Dominik, Staehelin, Johannes, Thouret, Valerie, Marenco, Alain·2000·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Tropospheric data from a number of aircraft campaigns have been gridded onto global maps, forming “data composites” of chemical species important in ozone photochemistry. Although these are not climatologies in the sense of a long temporal average, these data summaries are useful for providing a picture of the global distributions of these species and are a start to creating observations‐based climatologies. Using aircraft measurements from a number of campaigns, we have averaged observations of O 3, CO, NO, NOx, HNO 3, PAN, H 2 O 2, CH 3 OOH, HCHO, CH 3 COCH 3, C 2 H 6, and C 3 H 8 onto a 5° latitude by 5° longitude horizontal grid with a 1‐km vertical resolution. These maps provide information about the distributions at various altitudes, but also clearly show that direct observations of the global troposphere are still very limited. A set of regions with 10°–20° horizontal extent has also been chosen wherein there is sufficient data to study vertical profiles. These profiles are particularly valuable for comparison with model results, especially when a full suite of chemical species can be compared simultaneously. The O 3 and NO climatologies generated from measurements obtained during commercial aircraft flights associated writh the MOZAIC and NOXAR programs are incorporated with the data composites at 10–11 km. As an example of the utility of these data composites, observations are compared to results from two global chemical transport models, MOZART and IMAGES, to help identify incorrect emission sources, incorrect strength of convection, and missing chemistry in the models. These comparisons suggest that in MOZART the NOx biomass burning emissions may be too low and convection too weak and that the transport of ozone from the stratosphere in IMAGES is too great. The ozone profiles from the data composites are compared with ozonesonde climatologies and show that in some cases the aircraft data agree with the long‐term averages, but in others, such as in the western Pacific during PEM‐Tropics‐A, agreement is lacking. Finally, the data composites provide temporal and spatial information, which can help identify the locations and seasons where new measurements would be most valuable. All of the data composites presented here are available via the Internet (http://aoss.engin.umich.edu/SASSarchive/).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2000jd900232

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 169

Metadata

Authors
Emmons, L. K., Hauglustaine, D. A., Müller, J., Carroll, M. A., Brasseur, G. P., Brunner, D., Staehelin, J., Thouret, V., & Marenco, A.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2000-08
Volume
105
Issue
D16
Pages
20497-20538
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088232299
Cited by
169
References
0
FWCI
7.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Data composites of airborne observations of tropospheric ozone and its precursors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2000jd900232
The paper
Emmons, L. K., Hauglustaine, D. A., Müller, J., Carroll, M. A., Brasseur, G. P., Brunner, D., Staehelin, J., Thouret, V., & Marenco, A. (2000). Data composites of airborne observations of tropospheric ozone and its precursors. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900232

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.