Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 278

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 147 of the 147 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

UV shielding of NH3and O2by organic hazes in the Archean atmosphere

Pavlov, Alexander A., Brown, Lisa L., Kasting, James F.·2001·Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets

Abstract

The late Archean atmosphere was probably rich in biologically generated CH 4 and may well have contained a hydrocarbon haze layer similar to that observed today on Saturn's moon, Titan. Here we present a detailed model of the photochemistry of haze formation in the early atmosphere, and we examine the effects of such a haze layer on climate and ultraviolet radiation. We show that the thickness of the haze layer was limited by a negative feedback loop: A haze optical depth of more than ∼0.5 in the visible would have produced a strong “antigreenhouse effect,” thereby cooling the surface and slowing the rate at which CH 4 was produced. Given this climatic constraint on its visible optical depth, the amount of UV shielding provided by the haze can be estimated from knowledge of the optical properties and size distribution of the haze particles. Contrary to previous studies [Sagan and Chyba, 1997], we find that when the finite size of the particles is taken into account, the amount of UV shielding provided by the haze is small. Thus NH 3 should have been rapidly photolyzed and should not have been sufficiently abundant to augment the atmospheric greenhouse effect. We also examine the question of whether photosynthetically generated O 2 could have accumulated beneath the haze layer. For the model parameters considered here, the answer is “no”: The upper limit on ground level O 2 concentrations is ∼10−6 atm, and a more realistic estimate for pO 2 during the late Archean is 10−8 atm. The stability of both O 2 and NH 3 is sensitive to the size distribution and optical properties of the haze particles, neither of which is well known. Further theoretical and laboratory work is needed to address these uncertainties.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2000je001448

Cites

147 of 147 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 147 references

Cited by

See all 278

Metadata

Authors
Pavlov, A. A., Brown, L. L., & Kasting, J. F.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Published
2001-10
Volume
106
Issue
E10
Pages
23267-23287
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969468624
Cited by
278
References
147
FWCI
7.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: UV shielding of NH3and O2by organic hazes in the Archean atmosphere. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2000je001448
The paper
Pavlov, A. A., Brown, L. L., & Kasting, J. F. (2001). UV shielding of NH3and O2by organic hazes in the Archean atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000je001448

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.