The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Landslide triggering by rain infiltration
Open accessAbstract
Landsliding in response to rainfall involves physical processes that operate on disparate timescales. Relationships between these timescales guide development of a mathematical model that uses reduced forms of Richards equation to evaluate effects of rainfall infiltration on landslide occurrence, timing, depth, and acceleration in diverse situations. The longest pertinent timescale is A/D0, where D0 is the maximum hydraulic diffusivity of the soil and A is the catchment area that potentially affects groundwater pressures at a prospective landslide slip surface location with areal coordinates x, y and depth H. Times greater than A/D0 are necessary for establishment of steady background water pressures that develop at (x, y, H) in response to rainfall averaged over periods that commonly range from days to many decades. These steady groundwater pressures influence the propensity for landsliding at (x, y, H), but they do not trigger slope failure. Failure results from rainfall over a typically shorter timescale H2/D0 associated with transient pore pressure transmission during and following storms. Commonly, this timescale ranges from minutes to months. The shortest timescale affecting landslide responses to rainfall is , where g is the magnitude of gravitational acceleration. Postfailure landslide motion occurs on this timescale, which indicates that the thinnest landslides accelerate most quickly if all other factors are constant. Effects of hydrologic processes on landslide processes across these diverse timescales are encapsulated by a response function, , which depends only on normalized time, t*. Use of R(t*) in conjunction with topographic data, rainfall intensity and duration information, an infinite‐slope failure criterion, and Newton's second law predicts the timing, depth, and acceleration of rainfall‐triggered landslides. Data from contrasting landslides that exhibit rapid, shallow motion and slow, deep‐seated motion corroborate these predictions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Closed‐form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils
van Genuchten, M. T. (1980) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x · Cited by 27,578
Iverson, R. M. (1997) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/97rg00426 · Cited by 3,092
Self-citation
Cited by
Is climate change responsible for changing landslide activity in high mountains?
Huggel, C., Clague, J. J., & Korup, O. (2012) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.2223 · Cited by 522
Climatic factors influencing occurrence of debris flows
Wieczorek, G. F., & Glade, T. (2007) · Springer Praxis Books · doi:10.1007/3-540-27129-5_14 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Iverson, R. M.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1897-1910
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2079965317
- Cited by
- 2,132
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 40.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Landslide triggering by rain infiltration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2000wr900090
- The paper
- Iverson, R. M. (2000). Landslide triggering by rain infiltration. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000wr900090
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.