The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hydraulic tomography: Development of a new aquifer test method
Abstract
Hydraulic tomography (i.e., a sequential aquifer test) has recently been proposed as a method for characterizing aquifer heterogeneity. During a hydraulic tomography experiment, water is sequentially pumped from or injected into an aquifer at different vertical portions or intervals of the aquifer. During each pumping or injection, hydraulic head responses of the aquifer at other intervals are monitored, yielding a set of head/discharge (or recharge) data. By sequentially pumping (or injecting) water at one interval and monitoring the steady state head responses at others, many head/discharge (recharge) data sets are obtained. In this study a sequential inverse approach is developed to interpret results of hydraulic tomography. The approach uses an iterative geostatistical inverse method to yield the effective hydraulic conductivity of an aquifer, conditioned on each set of head/discharge data. To efficiently include all the head/discharge data sets, a sequential conditioning method is employed. It uses the estimated hydraulic conductivity field and covariances, conditioned on the previous head/discharge data set, as prior information for next estimations using a new set of pumping data. This inverse approach was first applied to hypothetical, two‐dimensional, heterogeneous aquifers to investigate the optimal sampling scheme for the hydraulic tomography, i.e., the design of well spacing, pumping, and monitoring locations. The effects of measurement errors and uncertainties in statistical parameters required by the inverse model were also investigated. Finally, the robustness of this inverse approach was demonstrated through its application to a hypothetical, three‐dimensional, heterogeneous aquifer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Closed‐form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils
van Genuchten, M. T. (1980) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x · Cited by 27,578
Review of Parameter Identification Procedures in Groundwater Hydrology: The Inverse Problem
Yeh, W. W. (1986) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/wr022i002p00095 · Cited by 1,150
A Reassessment of the Groundwater Inverse Problem
McLaughlin, D., & Townley, L. R. (1996) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/96wr00160 · Cited by 561
Kitanidis, P. K., & Vomvoris, E. G. (1983) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/wr019i003p00677 · Cited by 536
Cited by
Slater, L. (2007) · Surveys in Geophysics · doi:10.1007/s10712-007-9022-y · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Yeh, T. ‐. J., & Liu, S.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2095-2105
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2098981021
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydraulic tomography: Development of a new aquifer test method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2000wr900114
- The paper
- Yeh, T. ‐. J., & Liu, S. (2000). Hydraulic tomography: Development of a new aquifer test method. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000wr900114
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.