The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrologic models
Open accessAbstract
The uncertainty in a given hydrologic prediction is the compound effect of the parameter, data, and structural uncertainties associated with the underlying model. In general, therefore, the confidence in a hydrologic prediction can be improved by reducing the uncertainty associated with the parameter estimates. However, the classical approach to doing this via model calibration typically requires that considerable amounts of data be collected and assimilated before the model can be used. This limitation becomes immediately apparent when hydrologic predictions must be generated for a previously ungauged watershed that has only recently been instrumented. This paper presents the framework for a Bayesian recursive estimation approach to hydrologic prediction that can be used for simultaneous parameter estimation and prediction in an operational setting. The prediction is described in terms of the probabilities associated with different output values. The uncertainty associated with the parameter estimates is updated (reduced) recursively, resulting in smaller prediction uncertainties as measurement data are successively assimilated. The effectiveness and efficiency of the method are illustrated in the context of two models: a simple unit hydrograph model and the more complex Sacramento soil moisture accounting model, using data from the Leaf River basin in Mississippi.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Renard, B., Kavetski, D., Kuczera, G., Thyer, M., & Franks, S. W. (2010) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2009wr008328 · Cited by 910
Vrugt, J. A. (2016) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.08.013 · Cited by 851
Ajami, N. K., Duan, Q., & Sorooshian, S. (2007) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2005wr004745 · Cited by 597
Self-citationSimple spatially-distributed models for predicting flood inundation: A review
Hunter, N. M., Bates, P. D., Horritt, M. S., & Wilson, M. D. (2007) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.021 · Cited by 440
Appraisal of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method
Stedinger, J. R., Vogel, R. M., Lee, S. U., & Batchelder, R. (2008) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2008wr006822 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Thiemann, M., Trosset, M., Gupta, H., & Sorooshian, S.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2521-2535
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2121032760
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrologic models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2000wr900405
- The paper
- Thiemann, M., Trosset, M., Gupta, H., & Sorooshian, S. (2001). Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrologic models. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000wr900405
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.