Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 558

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recycling oceanic crust: Quantitative constraints

Open access
Stracke, Andreas, Bizimis, Michael, Salters, Vincent J. M.·2003·Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems

Abstract

Recycled ancient oceanic crust with variable amounts of aging, or inclusion of sediments of differing types and origins has often been invoked as a source for present‐day ocean island basalts (OIB), but the current evidence remains largely qualitative. Previous quantitative modeling has shown that much has to be learned in order to better understand the implications of crustal recycling on mantle heterogeneity. Here, we present new model calculations incorporating recent constraints on subduction‐zone processes and the composition of subducted sediments. Modeled compositions of the recycled oceanic crust vary widely as a function of the recycling age and composition of the oceanic crust. HIMU‐type sources can only be created by recycling igneous oceanic crust if it has undergone substantial modification during subduction. Although the required modifications are qualitatively consistent with dehydration processes in subduction zones, the many uncertainties prevent a precise estimate of the isotopic composition of ancient recycled igneous crust. Inclusion of sediments increases the isotopic variability and although the resulting Sr and Nd isotopic signatures can be similar to enriched mantle (EM) signatures, the Pb isotopic composition of EM‐type OIB is difficult to reconcile with the presence of sediment in their sources. The large variability of modeled compositions of the subducted crust suggests that if mantle heterogeneity is largely formed by crustal recycling, each OIB is likely to have a unique isotopic composition resulting from specific combinations of composition, age and subduction modification of the subducted crust. Given the variability of the recycled components, a small number of relatively well‐defined enriched compositions can only be explained if either the subduction processing of oceanic crust is a far better defined process than observation would seem to indicate, or, the intramantle disaggregation and mixing of compositionally diverse recycled materials is surprisingly efficient.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2001gc000223

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 86 references

Cited by

See all 558

Metadata

Authors
Stracke, A., Bizimis, M., & Salters, V. J. M.
Venue
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Published
2003-03
Volume
4
Issue
3
ISSN
1525-2027 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1656874552
Cited by
558
References
86
FWCI
9.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recycling oceanic crust: Quantitative constraints. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2001gc000223
The paper
Stracke, A., Bizimis, M., & Salters, V. J. M. (2003). Recycling oceanic crust: Quantitative constraints. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gc000223

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.