Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 306

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Frictional‐viscous flow of phyllosilicate‐bearing fault rock: Microphysical model and implications for crustal strength profiles

Open access
Bos, Bart, Spiers, Christopher J.·2002·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

It is widely believed that around the brittle‐ductile transition, crustal faults can be significantly weaker than predicted by conventional two‐mechanism brittle‐ductile strength envelopes. Factors contributing to this weakness include the polyphase nature of natural rocks, foliation development, and the action of fluid‐assisted processes such as pressure solution. Recently, ring shear experiments using halite/kaolinite mixtures as an analogue for phyllosilicate‐rich rocks for the first time showed frictional‐viscous behavior (i.e., both normal stress and strain rate sensitive behavior) involving the combined effects of pressure solution and phyllosilicates. This behavior was accompanied by the development of a mylonitic microstructure. A quantitative assessment of the implications of this for the strength of natural faults has hitherto been hampered by the absence of a microphysical model. In this paper, a microphysical model for shear deformation of foliated, phyllosilicate‐bearing fault rock by pressure solution‐accommodated sliding along phyllosilicate foliae is developed. The model predicts purely frictional behavior at low and high shear strain rates and frictional‐viscous behavior at intermediate shear strain rates. The mechanical data on wet halite + kaolinite gouge compare favorably with the model. When applied to crustal materials, the model predicts major weakening with respect to conventional brittle‐ductile strength envelopes, in particular, around the brittle‐ductile transition. The predicted strength profiles suggest that in numerical models of crustal deformation the strength of high‐strain regions could be approximated by an apparent friction coefficient of 0.25–0.35 down to depths of 15–20 km.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2001jb000301

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Cited by

See all 306

Metadata

Authors
Bos, B., & Spiers, C. J.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
2002-02
Volume
107
Issue
B2
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080124836
Cited by
306
References
52
FWCI
8.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frictional‐viscous flow of phyllosilicate‐bearing fault rock: Microphysical model and implications for crustal strength profiles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2001jb000301
The paper
Bos, B., & Spiers, C. J. (2002). Frictional‐viscous flow of phyllosilicate‐bearing fault rock: Microphysical model and implications for crustal strength profiles. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jb000301

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.