The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Atmospheric budget of acetone
Open accessAbstract
The atmospheric budget and distribution of acetone are investigated by using a priori estimates of sources and sinks to constrain a global three‐dimensional atmospheric model simulation and then using atmospheric observations from 14 surface sites and 5 aircraft missions to improve these estimates through an inversion analysis. Observations over the South Pacific imply a large photochemical marine source of acetone, either from the ocean or from marine organic aerosol. Low concentrations of acetone measured at European sites in winter‐spring and in the Arctic in summer suggest a large microbial ocean sink. The summer‐to‐fall decrease of concentrations observed in Europe argues against a large source from plant decay. Continental observations in the tropics and at northern midlatitudes in summer imply a large source from terrestrial vegetation. Observations in the Northern Hemisphere outside summer imply a large source from atmospheric oxidation of anthropogenic isoalkanes (propane, isobutane, isopentane). Model simulation of isoalkanes and comparison to observations yields best global emission estimates of 12 Tg C yr−1 for propane (including only 0.6 Tg C yr−1 from biomass burning), 3.6 Tg C yr−1 for isobutane, and 5.0 Tg C yr−1 for isopentane. Our best estimate of the global acetone source is 95 Tg yr−1. The mean tropospheric lifetime of acetone is estimated to be 15 days. Terrestrial vegetation and oceans are the principal sources of acetone in the tropopause region (0.1–0.7 ppbv) except in the extratropical Northern Hemisphere, where oxidation of isoalkanes is more important.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chemistry of HOx radicals in the upper troposphere
Jaeglé, L. (2001) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(00)00376-9 · Cited by 217
Light nonmethane hydrocarbons in seawater
Plass‐Dülmer, C., Koppmann, R., Ratte, M., & Rudolph, J. (1995) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/94gb02416 · Cited by 107
Cited by
Horowitz, L. W., Walters, S., Mauzerall, D. L., Emmons, L. K., Rasch, P. J., Granier, C., Tie, X., Lamarque, J., Schultz, M. G., Tyndall, G. S., et al. (2003) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2002jd002853 · Cited by 909
Atmospheric composition change – global and regional air quality
Monks, P. S., Granier, C., Fuzzi, S., Stohl, A., Williams, M. L., Akimoto, H., Amann, M., Baklanov, A., Baltensperger, U., Bey, I., et al. (2009) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.08.021 · Cited by 872
Self-citationFu, T., Jacob, D. J., Wittrock, F., Burrows, J. P., Vrekoussis, M., & Henze, D. K. (2008) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2007jd009505 · Cited by 746
Self-citationHu, W., Hu, M., Hu, W., Jimenez, J. L., Yuan, B., Chen, W., Wang, M., Wu, Y., Chen, C., Wang, Z., et al. (2016) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1002/2015jd024020 · Cited by 401
Fu, T., Jacob, D. J., Palmer, P. I., Chance, K., Wang, Y. X., Barletta, B., Blake, D. R., Stanton, J. C., & Pilling, M. J. (2007) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2006jd007853 · Cited by 398
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jacob, D. J., Field, B. D., Jin, E. M., Bey, I., Li, Q., Logan, J. A., Yantosca, R. M., & Singh, H. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2002-05-27
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- D10
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2110760577
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atmospheric budget of acetone. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2001jd000694
- The paper
- Jacob, D. J., Field, B. D., Jin, E. M., Bey, I., Li, Q., Logan, J. A., Yantosca, R. M., & Singh, H. B. (2002). Atmospheric budget of acetone. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd000694
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.