Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 224

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Four years of continuous surface aerosol measurements from the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Southern Great Plains Cloud and Radiation Testbed site

Sheridan, P. J., Delene, D. J., Ogren, J. A.·2001·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Continuous measurements of the optical and microphysical properties of aerosol particles have been made at the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Southern Great Plains Cloud and Radiation Testbed (CART) site covering the 4‐year period from July 1996 through June 2000. Hourly, daily, and monthly statistics have been calculated that illustrate aerosol variability over a range of timescales. A pronounced peak in total particle number, centered on the midafternoon hours (local time), is evident in the hourly statistics. A broad early morning peak in the concentration of particles >0.1‐μm aerodynamic diameter corresponds with a similar peak in aerosol light‐scattering coefficient, σ sp. No strong cycles were observed in the daily statistics, suggesting that day of the week has only a minor influence on the observed aerosol variability. The σ sp at a wavelength of 550 nm for the 4‐year period showed a median value of 33 Mm−1 and was highest in February and August. The median fraction of aerosol light scattering at 550 nm due to particles <1‐μm aerodynamic diameter was 0.85 over the entire record. The median aerosol light absorption coefficient, σ ap, for the 4‐year period was ∼1.5 Mm−1 and was observed to be highest in late summer and autumn. The σ ap showed an increasing trend of nearly 0.5 Mm−1 yr, possibly due to increased agricultural field burning in the area. The occurrence of an autumn decrease in single‐scattering albedo, ω 0, was observed and may be caused by regional‐scale agricultural or transportation activities or seasonal changes in atmospheric flow patterns. The median value for ω 0 over the 4‐year period was 0.95, but this value has decreased ∼1–2% yr−1 presumably due to increased agricultural burning. Numerous field fires during the second half of 1999 influenced the surface aerosol at the CART site causing substantial variability of aerosol optical properties. The aerosol hygroscopic growth factor (f(RH)), corresponding to a relative humidity increase of 40–85%, showed a median value of 1.83 for 1999, although much lower values were observed during periods that were probably influenced by locally generated smoke and dust aerosols (median f(RH) = 1.55 and 1.59, respectively).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2001jd000785

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 224

Metadata

Authors
Sheridan, P. J., Delene, D. J., & Ogren, J. A.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2001-09
Volume
106
Issue
D18
Pages
20735-20747
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022794499
Cited by
224
References
0
FWCI
8.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Four years of continuous surface aerosol measurements from the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Southern Great Plains Cloud and Radiation Testbed site. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2001jd000785
The paper
Sheridan, P. J., Delene, D. J., & Ogren, J. A. (2001). Four years of continuous surface aerosol measurements from the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Southern Great Plains Cloud and Radiation Testbed site. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd000785

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.