An improved retrieval of tropospheric nitrogen dioxide from GOME

Abstract

We present a retrieval of tropospheric nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) columns from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) satellite instrument that improves in several ways over previous retrievals, especially in the accounting of Rayleigh and cloud scattering. Slant columns, which are directly fitted without low‐pass filtering or spectral smoothing, are corrected for an artificial offset likely induced by spectral structure on the diffuser plate of the GOME instrument. The stratospheric column is determined from NO 2 columns over the remote Pacific Ocean to minimize contamination from tropospheric NO 2 . The air mass factor (AMF) used to convert slant columns to vertical columns is calculated from the integral of the relative vertical NO 2 distribution from a global 3‐D model of tropospheric chemistry driven by assimilated meteorological data (Global Earth Observing System (GEOS)‐CHEM), weighted by altitude‐dependent scattering weights computed with a radiative transfer model (Linearized Discrete Ordinate Radiative Transfer), using local surface albedos determined from GOME observations at NO 2 wavelengths. The AMF calculation accounts for cloud scattering using cloud fraction, cloud top pressure, and cloud optical thickness from a cloud retrieval algorithm (GOME Cloud Retrieval Algorithm). Over continental regions with high surface emissions, clouds decrease the AMF by 20–30% relative to clear sky. GOME is almost twice as sensitive to tropospheric NO 2 columns over ocean than over land. Comparison of the retrieved tropospheric NO 2 columns for July 1996 with GEOS‐CHEM values tests both the retrieval and the nitrogen oxide radical (NO x ) emissions inventories used in GEOS‐CHEM. Retrieved tropospheric NO 2 columns over the United States, where NO x emissions are particularly well known, are within 18% of GEOS‐CHEM columns and are strongly spatially correlated ( r = 0.78, n = 288, p < 0.005). Retrieved columns show more NO 2 than GEOS‐CHEM columns over the Transvaal region of South Africa and industrial regions of the northeast United States and Europe. They are lower over Houston, India, eastern Asia, and the biomass burning region of central Africa, possibly because of biases from absorbing aerosols.