Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 171

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interactions between tropospheric chemistry and aerosols in a unified general circulation model

Open access
Liao, Hong, Adams, Peter J., Chung, Serena H., Seinfeld, John H., Mickley, Loretta J., Jacob, Daniel J.·2003·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

A unified tropospheric chemistry‐aerosol model has been developed within the Goddard Institute for Space Studies general circulation model (GCM). The model includes a detailed simulation of tropospheric ozone‐NOx‐hydrocarbon chemistry as well as aerosols and aerosol precursors. Predicted aerosol species include sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, black carbon, primary organic carbon, and secondary organic carbon. The partitioning of ammonia and nitrate between gas and aerosol phases is determined by on‐line thermodynamic equilibrium, and the formation of secondary organic aerosols is based on equilibrium partitioning and experimentally determined parameters. Two‐way coupling between aerosols and chemistry provides consistent chemical fields for aerosol dynamics and aerosol mass for heterogeneous processes and calculations of gas‐phase photolysis rates. Although the current version of the unified model does not include a prognostic treatment of mineral dust, we include its effects on photolysis and heterogeneous processes by using three‐dimensional off‐line fields. We also simulate sulfate and nitrate aerosols that are associated with mineral dust based on currently available chemical understanding. Considering both mineral dust uptake of HNO 3 and wet scavenging of HNO 3 on ice leads to closer agreement between predicted gas‐phase HNO 3 concentrations and measurements than in previous global chemical transport model simulations, especially in the middle to upper troposphere. As a result of the coupling between chemistry and aerosols, global burdens of both gas‐phase and aerosol species are predicted to respond nonlinearly to changing emissions of NOx, NH 3, and sulfur.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2001jd001260

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 171

Metadata

Authors
Liao, H., Adams, P. J., Chung, S. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Mickley, L. J., & Jacob, D. J.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2003-01-02
Volume
108
Issue
D1
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159771554
Cited by
171
References
2
FWCI
8.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interactions between tropospheric chemistry and aerosols in a unified general circulation model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2001jd001260
The paper
Liao, H., Adams, P. J., Chung, S. H., Seinfeld, J. H., Mickley, L. J., & Jacob, D. J. (2003). Interactions between tropospheric chemistry and aerosols in a unified general circulation model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001260

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.