The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Global and zonal total ozone variations estimated from ground‐based and satellite measurements: 1964–2000
Open accessAbstract
Six data sets of monthly average zonal total ozone were intercompared and then used to estimate latitudinal and global total ozone temporal variations and trends. The data sets were prepared by different groups and are based on TOMS, SBUV‐SBUV/2, GOME, and ground‐based measurements. Different approaches have been used to homogenize the records over the period 1979–2000. Systematic differences of up to 3% were found between different data sets for zonal and global total ozone area weighted average values. However, when these systematic differences were removed by deseasonalizing the data, the residuals agreed to within ±0.5% of the long‐term mean ozone values. All data sets show changes in the rate of the total ozone decline in recent years. While global ozone was fairly constant during the 1990s, the average values of the 1990s are about 2–3% lower than those of the late 1970s. About 38% of the global ozone is located between 25°S and 25°N where the data show no decline. The strongest decline and the largest variability occur over the 35°N–60°N zone during the winter‐spring season with the largest negative deviations occurring in 1993 and 1995. The decline in autumn is much smaller at these latitudes. Over the 35°S–60°S zone the ozone decline shows less seasonal dependence, and the largest deviations there were observed in 1985 and 1997. Sliding 11‐year trends were calculated to estimate ozone changes over different time intervals. The first interval was from 1964 to 1974, and the last interval was from 1990 to 2000. The steepest year‐round trends, of up to −5% per decade, occurred in the 11‐year periods ending between 1992 and 1997 over the 35°–60°N zone and between 1985 and 1993 over the 35°–55°S zone. More recent 11‐year trends have smaller declines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Simulation of secular trends in the middle atmosphere, 1950–2003
Garcia, R. R., Marsh, D. R., Kinnison, D. E., Boville, B. A., & Sassi, F. (2007) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2006jd007485 · Cited by 696
Eyring, V., Butchart, N., Waugh, D. W., Akiyoshi, H., Austin, J., Bekki, S., Bodeker, G. E., Boville, B. A., Brühl, C., Chipperfield, M. P., et al. (2006) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2006jd007327 · Cited by 429
Self-citationThe Mesosphere and Metals: Chemistry and Changes
Plane, J. M. C., Feng, W., & Dawkins, E. C. M. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500501m · Cited by 344
Long‐term ozone changes and associated climate impacts in CMIP5 simulations
Eyring, V., Arblaster, J. M., Cionni, I., Sedláček, J., Perlwitz, J., Young, P. J., Bekki, S., Bergmann, D., Cameron‐Smith, P., Collins, W. J., et al. (2013) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1002/jgrd.50316 · Cited by 324
A new formulation of equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine (EESC)
Newman, P. A., Daniel, J. S., Waugh, D. W., & Nash, E. R. (2007) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-7-4537-2007 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Fioletov, V. E., Bodeker, G. E., Miller, A. J., McPeters, R. D., & Stolarski, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2002-11-27
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- D22
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975582879
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global and zonal total ozone variations estimated from ground‐based and satellite measurements: 1964–2000. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2001jd001350
- The paper
- Fioletov, V. E., Bodeker, G. E., Miller, A. J., McPeters, R. D., & Stolarski, R. (2002). Global and zonal total ozone variations estimated from ground‐based and satellite measurements: 1964–2000. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001350
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.