The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interpretation of TOMS observations of tropical tropospheric ozone with a global model and in situ observations
Open accessAbstract
We interpret the distribution of tropical tropospheric ozone columns (TTOCs) from the Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) by using a global three‐dimensional model of tropospheric chemistry (GEOS‐CHEM) and additional information from in situ observations. The GEOS‐CHEM TTOCs capture 44% of the variance of monthly mean TOMS TTOCs from the convective cloud differential method (CCD) with no global bias. Major discrepancies are found over northern Africa and south Asia where the TOMS TTOCs do not capture the seasonal enhancements from biomass burning found in the model and in aircraft observations. A characteristic feature of these northern tropical enhancements, in contrast to southern tropical enhancements, is that they are driven by the lower troposphere where the sensitivity of TOMS is poor due to Rayleigh scattering. We develop an efficiency correction to the TOMS retrieval algorithm that accounts for the variability of ozone in the lower troposphere. This efficiency correction increases TTOCs over biomass burning regions by 3–5 Dobson units (DU) and decreases them by 2–5 DU over oceanic regions, improving the agreement between CCD TTOCs and in situ observations. Applying the correction to CCD TTOCs reduces by ∼5 DU the magnitude of the “tropical Atlantic paradox” [Thompson et al., 2000], i.e. the presence of a TTOC enhancement over the southern tropical Atlantic during the northern African biomass burning season in December–February. We reproduce the remainder of the paradox in the model and explain it by the combination of upper tropospheric ozone production from lightning NO x, persistent subsidence over the southern tropical Atlantic as part of the Walker circulation, and cross‐equatorial transport of upper tropospheric ozone from northern midlatitudes in the African “westerly duct.” These processes in the model can also account for the observed 13–17 DU persistent wave‐1 pattern in TTOCs with a maximum over the tropical Atlantic and a minimum over the tropical Pacific during all seasons. The photochemical effects of mineral dust have only a minor role on the modeled distribution of TTOCs, including over northern Africa, due to multiple competing effects. The photochemical effects of mineral dust globally decrease annual mean OH concentrations by 9%. A global lightning NO x source of 6 Tg N yr−1 in the model produces a simulation that is most consistent with TOMS and in situ observations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evidence for Substantial Variations of Atmospheric Hydroxyl Radicals in the Past Two Decades
Prinn, R. G., Huang, J., Weiss, R. F., Cunnold, D. M., Fraser, P. J., Simmonds, P. G., McCulloch, A., Harth, C., Salameh, P., O'Doherty, S., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058673 · Cited by 695
Radiative forcing from tropospheric ozone calculated with a unified chemistry-climate model
Mickley, L. J., Murti, P. P., Jacob, D. J., Logan, J. A., Koch, D. M., & Rind, D. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/1999jd900439 · Cited by 150
Self-citation
Cited by
Park, R. J., Jacob, D. J., Field, B. D., Yantosca, R. M., & Chin, M. (2004) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2003jd004473 · Cited by 987
Self-citationAtmospheric composition change – global and regional air quality
Monks, P. S., Granier, C., Fuzzi, S., Stohl, A., Williams, M. L., Akimoto, H., Amann, M., Baklanov, A., Baltensperger, U., Bey, I., et al. (2009) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.08.021 · Cited by 872
Self-citationThe global lightning-induced nitrogen oxides source
Schumann, U., & Huntrieser, H. (2007) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-7-3823-2007 · Cited by 708
Duncan, B. N., Martin, R. V., Staudt, A. C., Yevich, R., & Logan, J. A. (2003) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2002jd002378 · Cited by 698
Self-citationGlobal air quality and climate
Fiore, A. M., Naik, V., Spracklen, D. V., Steiner, A., Unger, N., Prather, M., Bergmann, D., Cameron-Smith, P. J., Cionni, I., Collins, W. J., et al. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs35095e · Cited by 521
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, R. V., Jacob, D. J., Logan, J. A., Bey, I., Yantosca, R. M., Staudt, A. C., Li, Q., Fiore, A. M., Duncan, B. N., Liu, H., Ginoux, P., & Thouret, V.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2002-09-24
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- D18
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2103368158
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interpretation of TOMS observations of tropical tropospheric ozone with a global model and in situ observations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2001jd001480
- The paper
- Martin, R. V., Jacob, D. J., Logan, J. A., Bey, I., Yantosca, R. M., Staudt, A. C., Li, Q., Fiore, A. M., Duncan, B. N., Liu, H., Ginoux, P., & Thouret, V. (2002). Interpretation of TOMS observations of tropical tropospheric ozone with a global model and in situ observations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001480
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.