The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generalized model for NOx and N2O emissions from soils
Abstract
We describe a submodel to simulate NOx and N 2 O emissions from soils and present comparisons of simulated NOx and N 2 O fluxes from the DAYCENT ecosystem model with observations from different soils. The N gas flux submodel assumes that nitrification and denitrification both contribute to N 2 O and NOx emissions but that NOx emissions are due mainly to nitrification. N 2 O emissions from nitrification are calculated as a function of modeled soil NH 4+ concentration, water‐filled pore space (WFPS), temperature, pH, and texture. N 2 O emissions from denitrification are a function of soil NO 3− concentration, WFPS, heterotrophic respiration, and texture. NOx emissions are calculated by multiplying total N 2 O emissions by a NOx:N 2 O equation which is calculated as a function of soil parameters (bulk density, field capacity, and WFPS) that influence gas diffusivity. The NOx submodel also simulates NOx emission pulses initiated by rain events onto dry soils. The DAYCENT model was tested by comparing observed and simulated parameters in grassland soils across a range of soil textures and fertility levels. Simulated values of soil temperature, WFPS (during the non‐winter months), and NOx gas flux agreed reasonably well with measured values (r2 = 0.79, 0.64, and 0.43, respectively). Winter season WFPS was poorly simulated (r2 = 0.27). Although the correlation between simulated and observed N 2 O flux was poor on a daily basis (r2 = 0.02), DAYCENT was able to reproduce soil textural and treatment differences and the observed seasonal patterns of gas flux emissions with r2 values of 0.26 and 0.27, for monthly and NOr flux rates, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DAYCENT and its land surface submodel: description and testing
Parton, W. J., Hartman, M., Ojima, D., & Schimel, D. (1998) · Global and Planetary Change · doi:10.1016/s0921-8181(98)00040-x · Cited by 865
Self-citation
Cited by
Hudman, R. C., Moore, N. E., Mebust, A. K., Martin, R. V., Russell, A. R., Valin, L. C., & Cohen, R. C. (2012) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-12-7779-2012 · Cited by 538
Self-citationKoven, C. D., Riley, W. J., Subin, Z. M., Tang, J. Y., Torn, M. S., Collins, W. D., Bonan, G. B., Lawrence, D. M., & Swenson, S. C. (2013) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-10-7109-2013 · Cited by 481
Young, P. J., Naik, V., Fiore, A. M., Gaudel, A., Guo, J., Lin, M. Y., Neu, J. L., Parrish, D. D., Rieder, H. E., Schnell, J. L., et al. (2018) · Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.1525/elementa.265 · Cited by 444
CMIP6 Simulations With the CMCC Earth System Model (CMCC‐ESM2)
Lovato, T., Peano, D., Butenschön, M., Materia, S., Iovino, D., Scoccimarro, E., Fogli, P. G., Cherchi, A., Bellucci, A., Gualdi, S., et al. (2022) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2021ms002814 · Cited by 426
Pelletier, N., Pirog, R., & Rasmussen, R. (2010) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.009 · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Parton, W. J., Holland, E. A., Del Grosso, S. J., Hartman, M. D., Martin, R. E., Mosier, A. R., Ojima, D. S., & Schimel, D. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- D15
- Pages
- 17403-17419
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1615875926
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generalized model for NOx and N2O emissions from soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2001jd900101
- The paper
- Parton, W. J., Holland, E. A., Del Grosso, S. J., Hartman, M. D., Martin, R. E., Mosier, A. R., Ojima, D. S., & Schimel, D. S. (2001). Generalized model for NOx and N2O emissions from soils. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd900101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.