The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling spatially distributed ecosystem flux of boreal forest using hyperspectral indices from AVIRIS imagery
Open accessAbstract
Correct estimation of spatially distributed CO 2 flux is of utmost importance for regional and global carbon balance studies. Tower‐based instruments provide flux data from a small footprint area and may not be suitable for spatial extrapolation over areas not represented by the towers. In this study we developed a method of combining optical indices from remotely sensed hyperspectral images with flux data from towers covering different vegetation types to make spatially continuous maps of gross CO 2 fluxes. Using a simple light‐use efficiency model, we tested the ability of spectral indices derived from Airborne Visible Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) imagery to estimate photosynthetic fluxes of several boreal forest stands. Because CO 2 flux from terrestrial ecosystems is dependent on both vegetation cover and physiological state, we hypothesized that measures of both forest structure and physiology were important for flux estimation. Consequently, the modeled fluxes considered both the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and a scaled value of the photochemical reflectance index (PRI), both derived from narrowband reflectance. NDVI alone was of limited use in describing the variation in ecosystem fluxes (R2= 0.26). Addition of the PRI, which is related to xanthophyll cycle pigment activity and unrelated to NDVI, improved the agreement between modeled and measured fluxes (R2= 0.82). Our results also indicated that simple extrapolation of point‐based flux tower data to represent the large‐area fluxes of boreal forest may lead to an underestimation of the spatially distributed fluxes, at least for the vegetation types studied in this analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain
Monteith, J. L. (1977) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1977.0140 · Cited by 3,484
Cited by
Baldocchi, D. (2008) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt07151 · Cited by 1,123
Optical vegetation indices for monitoring terrestrial ecosystems globally
Zeng, Y., Hao, D., Huete, A., Dechant, B., Berry, J., Chen, J. M., Joiner, J., Frankenberg, C., Bond-Lamberty, B., Ryu, Y., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-022-00298-5 · Cited by 837
Using Imaging Spectroscopy to Study Ecosystem Processes and Properties
USTIN, S. L., ROBERTS, D. A., GAMON, J. A., ASNER, G. P., & GREEN, R. O. (2004) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0523:uistse]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 580
Self-citationAngular sensitivity analysis of vegetation indices derived from CHRIS/PROBA data
Verrelst, J., Schaepman, M. E., Koetz, B., & Kneubühler, M. (2008) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2007.11.001 · Cited by 364
Serbin, S. P., Dillaway, D. N., Kruger, E. L., & Townsend, P. A. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/err294 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Rahman, A. F., Gamon, J. A., Fuentes, D. A., Roberts, D. A., & Prentiss, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- D24
- Pages
- 33579-33591
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969548285
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling spatially distributed ecosystem flux of boreal forest using hyperspectral indices from AVIRIS imagery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2001jd900157
- The paper
- Rahman, A. F., Gamon, J. A., Fuentes, D. A., Roberts, D. A., & Prentiss, D. (2001). Modeling spatially distributed ecosystem flux of boreal forest using hyperspectral indices from AVIRIS imagery. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd900157
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.