The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating the sources and transport of nutrients in the Waikato River Basin, New Zealand
Open accessAbstract
We calibrated SPARROW (Spatially Referenced Regression on Watershed Attributes) surface water‐quality models using measurements of total nitrogen and total phosphorus from 37 sites in the 13,900‐km 2 Waikato River Basin, the largest watershed on the North Island of New Zealand. This first application of SPARROW outside of the United States included watersheds representative of a wide range of natural and cultural conditions and water‐resources data that were well suited for calibrating and validating the models. We applied the spatially distributed model to a drainage network of nearly 5000 stream reaches and 75 lakes and reservoirs to empirically estimate the rates of nutrient delivery (and their levels of uncertainty) from point and diffuse sources to streams, lakes, and watershed outlets. The resulting models displayed relatively small errors; predictions of stream yield (kg ha−1 yr−1) were typically within 30% or less of the observed values at the monitoring sites. There was strong evidence of the accuracy of the model estimates of nutrient sources and the natural rates of nutrient attenuation in surface waters. Estimated loss rates for streams, lakes, and reservoirs agreed closely with experimental measurements and empirical models from New Zealand, North America, and Europe as well as with previous U.S. SPARROW models. The results indicate that the SPARROW modeling technique provides a reliable method for relating experimental data and observations from small catchments to the transport of nutrients in the surface waters of large river basins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonpoint Pollution of Surface Waters with Phosphorus and Nitrogen
Carpenter, S. R., Caraco, N. F., Correll, D. L., Howarth, R. W., Sharpley, A. N., & Smith, V. H. (1998) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:nposww]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 6,099
AN EXAMINATION OF LAND USE ‐ NUTRIENT EXPORT RELATIONSHIPS 1
Beaulac, M. N., & Reckhow, K. H. (1982) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1982.tb00109.x · Cited by 404
Cited by
Denitrification across landscapes and waterscapes: a synthesis
Seitzinger, S., Harrison, J. A., Böhlke, J. K., Bouwman, A. F., Lowrance, R., Peterson, B., Tobias, C., & Drecht, G. V. (2006) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2064:dalawa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,679
Alexander, R. B., Smith, R. A., Schwarz, G. E., Boyer, E. W., Nolan, J. V., & Brakebill, J. W. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0716103 · Cited by 889
Self-citationBiggs, T. W., Dunne, T., & Martinelli, L. A. (2004) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1023/b:biog.0000025744.78309.2e · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Alexander, R. B., Elliott, A. H., Shankar, U., & McBride, G. B.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W1639078886
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating the sources and transport of nutrients in the Waikato River Basin, New Zealand. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2001wr000878
- The paper
- Alexander, R. B., Elliott, A. H., Shankar, U., & McBride, G. B. (2002). Estimating the sources and transport of nutrients in the Waikato River Basin, New Zealand. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001wr000878
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.