The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Valley incision by debris flows: Evidence of a topographic signature
Open accessAbstract
The sculpture of valleys by flowing water is widely recognized, and simplified models of incision by this process (e.g., the stream power law) are the basis for most recent landscape evolution models. Under steady state conditions a stream power law predicts that channel slope varies as an inverse power law of drainage area. Using both contour maps and laser altimetry, we find that this inverse power law rarely extends to slopes greater than ∼0.03 to 0.10, values below which debris flows rarely travel. Instead, with decreasing drainage area the rate of increase in slope declines, leading to a curved relationship on a log‐log plot of slope against drainage area. Fieldwork in the western United States and Taiwan indicates that debris flow incision of bedrock valley floors tends to terminate upstream of where strath terraces begin and where area‐slope data follow fluvial power laws. These observations lead us to propose that the steeper portions of unglaciated valley networks of landscapes steep enough to produce mass failures are predominately cut by debris flows, whose topographic signature is an area‐slope plot that curves in log‐log space. This matters greatly as valleys with curved area‐slope plots are both extensive by length (>80% of large steepland basins) and comprise large fractions of main stem valley relief (25–100%). As a consequence, valleys carved by debris flows, not rivers, bound most hillslopes in unglaciated steeplands. Debris flow scour of these valleys appears to limit the height of some mountains to substantially lower elevations than river incision laws would predict, an effect absent in current landscape evolution models. We anticipate that an understanding of debris flow incision, for which we currently lack even an empirical expression, would substantially change model results and inferences drawn about linkages between landscape morphology and tectonics, climate, and geology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Iverson, R. M. (1997) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/97rg00426 · Cited by 3,092
Cited by
Expression of active tectonics in erosional landscapes
Kirby, E., & Whipple, K. X. (2012) · Journal of Structural Geology · doi:10.1016/j.jsg.2012.07.009 · Cited by 1,093
Crosby, B. T., & Whipple, K. X. (2006) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.08.023 · Cited by 632
Tectonic and lithologic controls on bedrock channel profiles and processes in coastal California
Duvall, A., Kirby, E., & Burbank, D. (2004) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface · doi:10.1029/2003jf000086 · Cited by 555
Formation of evenly spaced ridges and valleys
Perron, J. T., Kirchner, J. W., & Dietrich, W. E. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08174 · Cited by 317
Self-citationCyr, A. J., Granger, D. E., Olivetti, V., & Molin, P. (2010) · Lithosphere · doi:10.1130/l96.1 · Cited by 191
Metadata
- Authors
- Stock, J., & Dietrich, W. E.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2118719501
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 67.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Valley incision by debris flows: Evidence of a topographic signature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2001wr001057
- The paper
- Stock, J., & Dietrich, W. E. (2003). Valley incision by debris flows: Evidence of a topographic signature. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001wr001057
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.