The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spatial and temporal distributions of U.S. winds and wind power at 80 m derived from measurements
Open accessAbstract
This is a study to quantify U.S. wind power at 80 m (the hub height of large wind turbines) and to investigate whether winds from a network of farms can provide a steady and reliable source of electric power. Data from 1327 surface stations and 87 soundings in the United States for the year 2000 were used. Several methods were tested to extrapolate 10‐m wind measurements to 80 m. The most accurate, a least squares fit based on twice‐a‐day wind profiles from the soundings, resulted in 80‐m wind speeds that are, on average, 1.3–1.7 m/s faster than those obtained from the most common methods previously used to obtain elevated data for U.S. wind power maps, a logarithmic law and a power law, both with constant coefficients. The results suggest that U.S. wind power at 80 m may be substantially greater than previously estimated. It was found that 24% of all stations (and 37% of all coastal/offshore stations) are characterized by mean annual speeds ≥6.9 m/s at 80 m, implying that the winds over possibly one quarter of the United States are strong enough to provide electric power at a direct cost equal to that of a new natural gas or coal power plant. The greatest previously uncharted reservoir of wind power in the continental United States is offshore and nearshore along the southeastern and southern coasts. When multiple wind sites are considered, the number of days with no wind power and the standard deviation of the wind speed, integrated across all sites, are substantially reduced in comparison with when one wind site is considered. Therefore a network of wind farms in locations with high annual mean wind speeds may provide a reliable and abundant source of electric power.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kempton, W., & Tomić, J. (2005) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.12.022 · Cited by 2,126
Cleaning the air and improving health with hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles
Jacobson, M. Z., Colella, W. G., & Golden, D. M. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1109157 · Cited by 1,023
Self-citationLarge-Scale Offshore Wind Power in the United States: Assessment of Opportunities and Barriers
Musial, W., & Ram, B. (2010) · doi:10.2172/990101 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Archer, C. L., & Jacobson, M. Z.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2003-05-13
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- D9
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2130923460
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial and temporal distributions of U.S. winds and wind power at 80 m derived from measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2002jd002076
- The paper
- Archer, C. L., & Jacobson, M. Z. (2003). Spatial and temporal distributions of U.S. winds and wind power at 80 m derived from measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002076
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.