The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CAPRAM 2.4 (MODAC mechanism): An extended and condensed tropospheric aqueous phase mechanism and its application
Open accessAbstract
A detailed and extended chemical mechanism describing tropospheric aqueous phase chemistry (147 species and 438 reactions) is presented here as Chemical Aqueous Phase Radical Mechanism (CAPRAM) 2.4 (MODAC mechanism). The mechanism based on the former version 2.3 [Herrmann et al., 2000] contains extended organic and transition metal chemistry and is formulated more explicitly based on a critical review of the literature. The aqueous chemistry has been coupled to the gas phase mechanism Regional Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling (RACM) [Stockwell et al., 1997], and phase exchange accounted for using the resistance model of Schwartz [1986]. A method for estimating mass accommodation coefficients (α) is described, which accounts for functional groups contained in a particular compound. A condensed version has also been developed to allow the use of CAPRAM 2.4 (MODAC mechanism) in higher‐scale models. Here the reproducibility of the concentration levels of selected target species (i.e., NOx, S(IV), H 2 O 2, NO 3, OH, O 3, and H+) within the limits of ± 5% was used as a goal for eliminating insignificant reactions from the complete CAPRAM 2.4 (MODAC mechanism). This has been done using a range of initial conditions chosen to represent different atmospheric scenarios, and this produces a robust and concise set of reactions. The most interesting results are obtained using atmospheric conditions typical for an urban scenario, and the effects introduced by updating the aqueous phase chemistry are highlighted, in particular, with regard to radicals, redox cycling of transition metal ions and organic compounds. Finally, the reduced scheme has been incorporated into a one‐dimensional (1‐D) marine cloud model to demonstrate the applicability of this mechanism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Warneck, P. (1999) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/a906558j · Cited by 125
Cited by
Aumont, B., Szopa, S., & Madronich, S. (2005) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-5-2497-2005 · Cited by 309
When Aerosol Sulfate Goes Up, So Does Oxalate: Implication for the Formation Mechanisms of Oxalate
Yu, J. Z., Huang, X.-F., Xu, J., & Hu, M. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es049559f · Cited by 287
Liu, Z., Bentel, M. J., Yu, Y., Ren, C., Gao, J., Pulikkal, V. F., Sun, M., Men, Y., & Liu, J. (2021) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c00353 · Cited by 198
RETRACTED: Reduced atmospheric sulfate enhances fine particulate nitrate formation in eastern China
Wen, L., Xue, L., Dong, C., Wang, X., Chen, T., Jiang, Y., Gu, R., Zheng, P., Li, H., Shan, Y., et al. (2023) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165303 · Cited by 24
Self-citationRetracted
Metadata
- Authors
- Ervens, B., George, C., Williams, J. E., Buxton, G. V., Salmon, G. A., Bydder, M., Wilkinson, F., Dentener, F., Mirabel, P., Wolke, R., & Herrmann, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2003-07-27
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- D14
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2153201520
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CAPRAM 2.4 (MODAC mechanism): An extended and condensed tropospheric aqueous phase mechanism and its application. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2002jd002202
- The paper
- Ervens, B., George, C., Williams, J. E., Buxton, G. V., Salmon, G. A., Bydder, M., Wilkinson, F., Dentener, F., Mirabel, P., Wolke, R., & Herrmann, H. (2003). CAPRAM 2.4 (MODAC mechanism): An extended and condensed tropospheric aqueous phase mechanism and its application. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.